An absolutely deserved victory for BVB against a grateful opponent who was much stronger in the first leg. What Guirassy does again is really embarrassing. In the BL, nobody whistles what he keeps trying. In the CL, the VAR is not even switched on, which confirms the weak SR performance in the entire game. As a result, the game tilts and afterwards nothing comes from Lille. Now Barcelona is waiting, which will be much more demanding.
I waited for this analysis. Dortmund didn’t play well, Lille just played badly.
You can definitely discuss the penalty, but Dortmund was the clearly stronger team. And Lille is anything but a grateful opponent, even if Barca will surely become the more difficult opponent again. But you don’t even defeat Lille in the way, they plastered Feyenoord 6: 1, Real 1: 0 and A. Madrid 3: 1.
Before the 1-0 through Lille, BVB always floats, but after that you got much stronger and not because Lille had stopped playing football. The BVB was rather in the first leg. The first half was good and the second half was nothing – Lille had unnecessarily got access to the play again.
That was written very often about Bavaria against Leverkusen. Not Bavaria was so good but so bad. That’s how it is. 🙈
What is wrong to understand about “absolutely deserved victory”?
When FC Bayern plays against Dorfhausen 08, they also win absolutely deservedly. But you also win that if you run with a B-team and operate the quasi refusal to work.
In which you talk badly the opponent “grateful opponent”, “unjustified penalty” and “from Lille can no longer get anything at all”, you also talk badly with the performance of the BVBS. At least you reduce their performance.
Lille was anything but an easy opponent, but against whom you have now delivered 2 1/2 good halves and a disaster in half.
Sometimes you are very stupid you do with your statements “People’s badly the BVB”, “the BVB has risen it in the first leg” and with the implication that Lille only got the access in the second half because the BVB played badly, but just the same in a different direction. Not Lille got better from half -time and fought back in, no BVB just got worse from half -time.
In the end, both statements are usually just true, just not as extreme as a one -sided statement may prove. The fact that a course of the game is usually due to the fact that a team gets worse and that one gets better.
Since then to complain that someone only portrays one side while you do it yourself, it is not necessarily smart …
Furthermore, I would not interpret the statements of “grateful opponents”, “unjustified penalty” and “from Lille afterwards nothing more” as you do.
“Thankful opponents” -> If you look at who else had everything qualified, Lille is definitely more grateful than the top clubs such as PSG, Liverpool or Real, in my view also as Aston Villa, who were the other possible lot, but I can argue that way. Since then to say that Lille is grateful, she does not make it a bad team, but should simply put the team’s skills in relation to other teams such as the above.
“Unjustified penalty” -> no idea where the Lille should talk badly, if at all it talks to the referee bad …
“After that nothing comes from Lille anymore” -> Can both be praised for BVB and criticism of Lille, the question is what was important? That BVB was better in the game? Or that Lille lost the thread? Or on both things, with which we would be back at the point that I described earlier …
And before you note it, I know that I do exactly what I criticize in the last paragraph with you beforehand. This should only be used to show that you can take your type of reasoning 1: 1 and just turn it around 