An electric to travel? Better a Kodiaq diesel

The official prices of the Skoda Kodiaq are not yet known, which will start production throughout 2024. In its second generation, this five or seven-seat SUV, It is longer, but also lower and narrower. With an eye on the model to come, We tested a 150 HP 2.0 TDI diesel unit of the current range to demonstrate that, despite the obsession with electrified models, this fuel is still the most interesting for traveling.

One of its main novelties is the introduction of a plug-in hybrid variant, in addition to the greater technological presence and connectivity equipment. Both evolutions are more than necessary for a Kodiaq that has become outdated, not so much for the practical aspect but for the aesthetic impression. Despite being from 2021, it is an SUV that was launched in 2016 of which we have only experienced one update.

It is noticeable in details such as the central screen that, despite being compatible with Apple CarPlay and Android Autostill has a small size, 8 inches for Bolero and Amundsen finishes and of 9.2 inches for the top of the range Columbus. Its operation and speed is more than correct, in addition to incorporate two USB C in the center console arealy share the spotlight with a 10.25-inch Virtual Cockpit. That screen is up to date and has endless customization possibilities.

The steering wheel will remain identical in the new generationwhich will look 12.9 inch central screen and the curious Dmart Dials, which will allow you to manage functions such as air conditioning, driving modes or sound to the driver’s liking. In the tested model, however, they are the typical and classic air conditioning roulettes, along with the quick functions of the emergency light, door locking, parking assistants, etc.

As a family SUV, the current Skoda Kodiaq offers excellent and cozy interior space. The model tested was the seven-seater variant, which measures 4.69 meters long by 1.88 m wide and 1.68 meters highwith a 2.78 meter wheelbase. He trunk It approves up to 735 liters of capacity with five seats available and 270 liters with the three rows available. During our trip, we had to resort to the capacity total of 2,005 liters and its comfort was the most relevant thing about the cabin.

An interior that, like Skoda, has a large number of solutions Simply Clever such as the ice scraper, mobile device holders for the rear seats, blackout curtains, a spare wheel under the trunk floor, dividers and handles for the cargo and door protectors, among others.

Driving style affects fuel consumption, but it drastically affects the energy consumption of an electric car. He 150 HP 2.0 TDI diesel block maintained an average of 7.5 l/100 km during the route to Navarra at the maximum speed allowed, but could beasily give out at 6.5 l/100 km which remained in daily circulation the rest of the week.

The 7-speed DSG automatic transmission is precise and almost imperceptible, but it tends to prioritize high gears early. That configuration impairs the Kodiaq’s reactionsthat seems less powerful than it is and even falls short on inclined climbs and with weight in the trunk. If you are going to travel a lot, I would go for the 200 HP option.

According to the calculation of the Via Michelintravel with a diesel until Tudela from Madrid represents an expense of 29.16 euros and it has been quite approximate. In case of travel with an electricwhich should be charged before starting the journey, we would arrive at the station Ionity of Tudela Sur with the pressing need to charge the vehicle. TO 0.65 euros/kWhthis action will not go below 30 euros.

The economic part is ruled out as an advantage for the electric one, with the inconvenience of the time invested and the anxiety caused by the lack of infrastructure in our country. For this reason, and for the rolling quality of a Skoda Kodiaq comfortable, spacious and smooth drivingwe will continue to defend diesel as the best alternative for traveling drivers.