Heilooër Sa has been guilty of attempted rape and unlawful deprivation of liberty. According to his lawyer, there would be no attempted rape and the suspect himself would have fallen victim to provocation. The court does not agree with this.
“The suspect took the considerable risk that he acted without the victim’s consent. He was aware that people can present themselves on a website for conducting chat conversations with a sexual character as another.”
‘Chance of repetition is small’
The judge finds that there are no indications that the man would have come to such serious acts without deception. That is why the court finds an unconditional prison sentence, longer than its custody, not appropriate. The court also considers a conditional punishment to be superfluous, because experts consider the chance of recurrence small. He does receive a 250 -hour community service, however, Far more than the 150 hours that the OM had demanded.
Schagenaar GS is guilty of provoking the attempted rape and using the identity of four women. The court finds it very serious that the suspect has staged the attempted rape carefully and in a devious manner. The court also blames the suspect for having withheld his role after the incident for weeks.
Schagenaar must be treated
In addition to a prison sentence, the court also finds it important that GS receives treatment. That is why he is also given a conditional prison sentence of a year, with a probationary period of five years. He must be treated and receives a contact ban with the victim and a location ban for part of Schagen.
The suspects together have to pay more than 8,000 euros in compensation to the victim. In addition, GS has to pay nearly 3,000 euros in compensation to the three other victims.