Coalition young people have published their statements on whether Erika Vikman is “suitable” as a Finnish Eurovision Song Contest.
Erika Vikman’s Eurovision Song Contest speaks to the statements of the Coalition Youth. Pink bröijer
Erika Vikman, the winner of the New Music Competition and the Finnish Eurovision Song Contest, has been confronted with the youth organizations operating in Uusimaa.
The Coalition Organization of the Coalition Organization Uusimaa Coalition Youth published on 12 February statementthat Erika Vikman ICH KONE It is not a suitable song to represent Finland in the Eurovision Song Contest.
In its statement, the organization reminds us that UMK is a program produced by YLE’s tax resources, “the idea is to be a family -oriented format.”
– We are particularly concerned about the normalization of sex and sexuality in our society. Vikman’s visa presentation is in all its splendor. Although Ich toss It has been speculated to be a good opportunity to even survive the Eurovision Song Contest, it must not be preceded by our values, the statement writes.
The statement also requires the Finnish Eurovision Song Contest to represent “Finnish civilization and have a certain amount of dignity”.
– The dignity is completely absent from Vikman’s presentation as he makes a woman a sexual object. The whole performance is full of abundant sex and sexual release, which puts the Finnish woman’s sexual object in the Eurovision Song Contest.
The Uusimaa Coalition Party also highlights last year’s representative in their statement.
– Titled for drinking songs Wrapper Cha cha cha cha) Even before the wisdom, the audience had heated the audience’s feelings in his own year, so how can our country be able to tolerate this song in Vikman’s Eurovision Song Contest?
If the publication is not visible, you can watch it from this link.
The statement on Instagram has garnered unbelieving comments.
– This must be a joke, one thinks one.
Helsinki Coalition Young people wrote one’s own counterpart The concern of the Uusimaa Coalition Party. According to the organization, the Eurovision Song Contest does not need moralistic patronage, but you should rely on democracy and freedom of culture.
– The whole debate on the “suitability” of Vikman’s song is based on the idea that politicians, the media, or something else should be able to determine what kind of music is acceptable and what is not. This is a dangerous way of thinking. Music is art, and it is not only the task of art to entertain, but also to evoke emotions, conversation and sometimes provoking, writes Helsinki’s coalition youth in their statement.
The organization points out that Finland sends a song voted by Finns to the Eurovision Song Contest, one that the people were democratically chosen.
– In addition, it is worth asking why women’s sexual expression still arouses such a strong resentment. Sexuality and its handling in art is not a new phenomenon – neither in Finland nor in Eurovision. Is the problem really the message of the song or the fact that the woman presents it openly and confidently? The coalition youth in Helsinki asks.
In their statement, the Uusimaa Conservative youth writes that the dignity is completely missing from Vikman’s presentation when he only makes the woman a sexual object. Pink bröijer
Erika Vikman himself said, during the publication of his UMK’s competition song, that it is just about taking power to himself.
– Everything about your sexuality is in your own hands. Enjoyment should not be taboo, he comments in the release.
Vikman also had his message in an interview with Iltalehti to people who feel he was in some way or are his “haters”.
– It’s okay, and that’s why I’m going to be too much in the future. Maybe they learn to deal with such characters, and one day we are not too much and not waking up so much anger, he wondered.
– Hate, remember, you give me visibility all the time. You promote me. And I enjoy it, Vikman reminded.