The parliamentary debate on the failed agricultural agreement was full of ‘newspeak‘. One politician after another talked about it target control, substance balance, process level, chain partners, plus packages, catch and dormant crops and food systems, as if these were terms from everyday language, which the non-entered can easily find in the dictionary. That’s not right, maybe an avid Scrabble player can figure out what a area plan is, but at one landscape service he’s going to get in trouble anyway. Is it something like worship services or night services? And what about one peak loader. In Dutch we know pike hair and from English we have de peak experience taken over and that until peak experience converted. Does ‘peak load’ also refer to a peak?
Growing maize cultivation
And then there’s the habitat corn. Habitat is a term from biology and refers to the natural habitat of an animal species. Is this perhaps suggesting that the ubiquitous proliferation of maize cultivation is the natural destination of our countryside? Some MPs are still dissatisfied latent spaces that solved the problems, but latent does it mean hidden? Where are they hidden invisibly in our overpopulated country? Pessimists in the Chamber feared planetary boundaries. We live in a planetary system that is part of an expanding universe. So where are those limits? Another spokesman said nature inclusivebut inclusive means that it encompasses everything and everyone, so much more than just nature.
Everyone appeared to be well-intentioned with the farming sectorbut one sector is essentially part of a circle. This introduces the image of a society as a cake, of which the farmers make a tasty slice. That’s true, of course, but does anyone ever speak of a workers’ sector or an employer’s sector? The agricultural sector must entrepreneurial perspective be offered.
Perspective is a term from the art of drawing and indicates how to display an image in the correct proportions on the flat surface
Perspective is a term from the art of drawing and indicates how to display an image in the correct proportions on the flat surface. No wonder then that we followed the English development in which perspective pretty soon it could also stand for a distant view and hence, in a figurative sense, expectation for the future. But with that peasant perspective turns out to be nothing more than a generous income. So flat money.
A “wildly attractive” scheme is offered to those who prefer to go out of business. Ruggedly handsome somewhat similar stunning, bright yellow, sick to death, completely strange and crazy. The only difference is that ‘savagely attractive’ has only just been invented and is therefore not yet concatenated. Such a first part means nothing more than ‘very bad’, just as ‘blood’, ‘bang’, ‘dead’, ‘wild’ and ‘stack’ do. But why fierce and not, for example, super or mega attractive? Should the word appeal to the farmer’s presumed wild yet close to nature nature?

