After announcing for more than a month that the filing of his affidavit was “imminent,” Manuel Adorni finally formalized the documentation with which he tries to justify the origin of a substantial part of his assets. He did it 35 days after the political and judicial crisis broke out that has him under investigation for alleged illicit enrichment, and just hours before the start of the World Cup 2026, a context that the Casa Rosada observed as an opportunity to reduce the intensity of media coverage of the case.
The presentation made to the Anti-Corruption Office included a profound modification of the sworn statements that he had presented since his arrival in the government of Javier Milei. According to the documentation released and reconstructed, the current Chief of Staff incorporated assets and savings that did not appear in the original versions of his asset declarations and maintained that a significant portion of his fortune comes from operations carried out with Bitcoin between 2014 and 2018.
The most shocking fact was the magnitude of the funds incorporated. Adorni reported that he obtained profits of about $513,000 linked to investments in cryptocurrencies and retrospectively corrected the composition of the family assets since 2020. The rectification substantially modified the asset picture that he had presented until now to the control bodies.
The official explanation came after weeks of increasing judicial pressure. The investigation had already detected movements on digital asset platforms, funds associated with virtual wallets and cryptocurrency operations that raised suspicions about the existence of undeclared assets. The researchers even analyzed the possibility that there were more digital holdings than those initially identified.
Federal prosecutor Gerardo Pollicita received information from digital asset platforms and ordered the traceability of these operations to be deepened to determine amounts, origin of funds and possible omissions in asset declarations. The crypto issue became one of the main axes of the case because different publications indicated that at least two virtual wallets would have mobilized close to $80,000 that did not appear in the sworn statement corresponding to 2024. The investigators would also have put other wallets linked to the official’s financial environment under observation.
During an interview with José Del Río in Mesa Chica on LN+, the official defended the origin of these funds and assured that they corresponded to savings and investments prior to entering the State. There he acknowledged that part of that money remained outside official statements for years and justified this behavior by stating that he and his family had saved “in the black,” a phrase that unleashed a new political storm.
The delay in filing had begun to become a political problem of its own. On June 1, when the controversy had already been going on for almost three months, sources close to the official assured that the documentation would be presented before June 15. At that time there was talk of an imminent definition, although there was still no specific date. Finally, the delivery was completed just ten days after that promise and more than a month after Adorni began to announce that he was finalizing the details of the patrimonial justification.

The rectifications also affected the financial situation of his wife, Bettina Angeletti. The new documentation incorporated changes in the composition of family assets and sought to explain differences detected between the standard of living exhibited by the marriage and the officially declared income. The judicial case arose precisely because of these inconsistencies. In recent months, revelations have emerged about family trips abroad, private flights, real estate purchases, million-dollar renovations in a home in a Buenos Aires country and consumption that, according to researchers, was difficult to reconcile with the income declared by the official.
Among the elements that attracted the most attention were the renovations carried out on a weekend house, valued at around $250,000 according to testimonies incorporated into the case, in addition to the purchase of properties and a succession of high-cost trips. Justice is trying to determine whether these expenses can be reasonably explained with the resources that Adorni declared he had before the recent rectifications.
In parallel, the Chief of Staff and his wife decided to adhere to the simplified Profit regime, called “fiscal innocence”, provided for by Law 27,799, a tool promoted by milleismo itself to regularize tax situations. The ruling party maintains that the measure does not imply recognition of irregularities, while the opposition interprets that it constitutes an attempt to fiscally shield part of the funds now incorporated into the sworn statements.

The presentation made this week does not automatically close the file. The material must be evaluated by Justice, which will continue analyzing banking movements, real estate operations, consumption, tax records and transactions with cryptocurrencies. The central question remains the same as that which gave rise to the case: determining whether the evolution of the Chief of Staff’s assets can be fully justified with legal and duly documented income.
For now, the main novelty is political. After 35 days of announcements about an “imminent” presentation, Adorni finally showed the numbers with which he seeks to explain a fortune that went from becoming a judicial mystery to becoming one of the biggest public problems for the government led by Javier Milei.


