GI say: more than a news story, an employment office. A few months after the reopening of the case, which took place in March 2025, there is a new suspect for murder Andrea Sempiothe media circus shows no signs of abating, overflowing from classic TV talk shows to social, where there are Live marathons on YouTube that not even Mentana. The places of the debate change but not the substance, i.e that i Opinion professionals continue to essentially talk about themselves through third parties, Chiara Poggi forgotten by everyone.
Garlasco news: TV and social media, but Chiara Poggi is always forgotten
With this crime news story, the Italians have discovered themselves innocentists, guilty and, above all, disappointed and bored by television. From its times marked by advertising that forces whirlwinds exchanges of opinion where only those who shout the loudest are right. This tiredness it had already been in the air for some time and hit its own handlers. Those who, now, they betray signs of nervousness towards their own invited to the banquet Garlasco.
The first to give up he is irrepressible Massimo Giletti. Last November, during its broadcast The State of thingsgot impatient with Massimo Lovati, Andrea Sempio’s former lawyer, who threw smoke by bringing up deceased people rather than answering the question about the Linarello appraisal. A few days later the mild-mannered Milo Infante followed him closely. TO 2pm, find the courage to object to the usual verbal charge unidirectional by the resident criminologist, Roberta Bruzzone. The expert of narcissism and crimes promptly has moved to other locations, looking for a place where your expertise makes even cross-examination superfluous.
To distance the viewer that’s right the constant presence of a small circle, what Aldo Grasso calls “the carnival of opinion makers”. Experts, always the same, who they no longer share skills but sell their own reasons. Where the same data casually changes meaning depending on the current to which it belongs. The “people”, now, the one that everyone wants as share points but hates dealing with, he is no longer willing to believe what he is told but wants to see, form an opinion with their own inexperienced eyes.
Chiara Poggi, forgotten victim (Ansa)
Garlasco news: the victory of the subjective YouTube and the dangers of infinite truths
To ferry them into the world of infinite and possible truths There are YouTubers and surroundings. A chaotic yet vital planet in which characters who took flightif they cannot boast a thriving scientific curriculum or a column in a mainstream newspaper, they have found new and interesting ways of narrating crime news.
Between non-verbal communication gurus, autopsy lessons and dreams of reviewing the conviction of Charles Manson and Cain, some profiles spend time reading and show case files to their users. They host original voices and esteemed professionals who here finally have the space for a uninterrupted reasoning.
There is the journalist Gianluca Zanella with Dark Side, its independent news channel. One of the first YouTubers to deal with the case rigorouslywithout making mistakes or sensationalist shortcuts. And again, the format Over the night of the teacher Antonella Fucecchi and Emanuele Santandreagraduated in genetics and molecular biology.
YouTube & associates they take it upon themselves to lead everyone towards the promised land of truth and justice. The audience paying participates in the collective ritual of ideas and shared ability. Because every reflection on the Y chromosome has equal citizenship rights, whether that of a doctor or a pizza chef. Nevertheless, the dangers of this total openness to democratic (in)competences they are already present. The more details increase, the more the clarity is reduced until it completely espouses one party of opinion. They feed themselves Bias confirmation just looking voices that reinforce their beliefs. An imbalance that becomes extreme when the weapon is no longer reasoning or science but the dirty art of denigration.
Dissing among crime celebritiesvideos artfully cut in pure style cherry picking. Threats of lawsuit like candysilly nicknames and even teams of anonymous profiles, ready to put the enemies of the truth in a bad light (one’s own).
Alberto Stasi (photo Ansa)
Chiara Poggi: why the victim disappears from the media story
The few differences between new and old media dissolve completely in the face of what they have in common: everyone talks about Garlasco and yet everyone has forgotten his victim. Chiara Poggi is used as a tired slogan (“Justice for Chiara”) as an excuse to criticize his family (“Why don’t the Poggis want the truth for their daughter? What are they hiding?”). His name has even disappeared from the top search engine results, replaced by the location of the crime.
Very more reassuring to forget it to describe from pure opinion his killercalling him a paraphilic erotomaniac and also blond with icy eyes. Better to think about the suspect in the competition like a nerd with relationship problems with women. Someone who hides who knows what secret because in the summer he dresses in long-sleeved t-shirts.
The reality of the facts is that Chiara is not needed. After her death, she no longer has the right to reply on the matter. In this chaos made only of words, some might even come to disbelieve his version.
The story of the crime, waiting for December 18th
In the late morning of August 13, 2007 Chiara Poggi26 years old, she is found dead in the family villa in Garlasco (Pavia). The main one the suspect is Alberto Stasi, her boyfriend. The last to see her and the first to discover the crime. After two acquittals, the Court of Cassation annuls the sentence e he was definitively sentenced to 16 years’ imprisonment on appeal. A much discussed choice which, for some, it would not be beyond a reasonable doubt. He would even ignored the many gaps and investigative errors of the time, starting fromabsence of the murder weapon and motive.
In 2025 the Pavia prosecutor’s office reopens the case And investigates for murder (in competition with Stasi or others) Andrea Sempio, friend of the victim’s brother. Among the evidence against him: fingerprint 33 left on the wall near Chiara’s body, an unconfirmed alibi by previous investigators and DNA fragments.
Those found on the fingers and nails of the deceased, described by the Albani report from the investigating judge of Pavia, would be compatible with Sempio’s family genetic line. The long-awaited hearing will take place on December 18th which will crystallize the results of the evidentiary incident. A new chapter of story that risks never finding the end.