The climate of tension inside and around freedom advances added a new chapter in recent hours with an open confrontation on social networks between Nicolás Márquezwriter and biographer by Javier Milei, and Franco Bindimedia entrepreneur linked to Kirchnerism and indicated by his links with the intelligence services and current partner of the deputy Marcela Pagano.
The round trip began when Bindi published in X a screenshot of a chat with Márquez in which the latter spoke of “lifting a asshole in 0800” and “meet the kid in the hammer”, to which the interlocutor replied: “You have to stop a little, Nicolás.” The tone, which Bindi presented as an example of worrying behavior, sought to leave the libertarian reference exposed. Márquez counterattacked hard: he spread a private message from Bindi in which he, in May 2023, expressed himself derogatory about a woman, and addressed it directly to Pagano, asking him if his partner referred to her.
The personal crossing was thus dyed with political connotations. Pagano, who recently split from the official bloc in deputies, is in the eye of the storm since figures close to the government pointed out for being allegedly behind the recordings to Diego Spagnuoloformer head of the National Disability Agency (Andis). Those listening, which reveal alleged requests for brothers and overpricing, gave rise to the so -called “Audiogate”, a scandal that shakes the ruling party and hits Karina Milei, sister and general secretary of the president.

The deputy, a journalist of origin, not only distanced himself from the ruling party but also began judicial complaints against key libertarian armed figures. Among them, the chief of cabinet Guillermo Francos and the president of the Chamber of Deputies, Martín Menemwith whom he maintains a public confrontation. Pagano responsible for pressure maneuvers and institutional squeezes.

Within that framework, the crossing between Bindi and Márquez works as a mirror of that major intern. Márquez, a personal friend and one of Javier Milei’s strongest defenders in the intellectual plane, represents the hard voice of Mileism. Bindi, on the other hand, appears linked to a deputy in rebellion with the president and, at the same time, involved in versions about intelligence maneuvers and sensitive information leaks.
The result is a political show that transcends the private and becomes part of the open confrontation between different political factions. The fight in networks is not just an exchange of offensive messages: it reflects how the battle for the control of the narrative and the public exposure is fought today in real time, without mediations and with a strong cross -operations component.
By rn


