(Yeah, I know – the “ethical” refers to something else – it still has an ironic -cynical note.)
If I did not know exactly that the Ach-so-weighted Clasico must be there all of the Ach-so-weighted stars (also and especially those without any role model) so that Laliga does not lose too much money, that would be the type of foul (and behavior and then) for which I would be blocked for half a year because of deliberate violation of fundamental human values.
Honestly, that is probably the very lowest drawer to jump into the man with an obviously pure intention to injure it and also look forward to it afterwards because the other shouts so painfully. And something like that is called “athlete”! 
And also very significant (but unfortunately not surprisingly) that Real naturally does not ask for this complete character default of your own player, immediately seeks excuses again.
But the main thing is that you can always name (and complain about the media) when others made a (real or imaginary) mistake and have real (supposedly) disadvantaged.
I just looked at it and also have to say that there was too much conscious courage.
With such actions, I always ask myself how far you can go until you can be displayed because of assault.
Things that happen out of pure frustration also happen in amateur football.
Is that a stupid question? Or can professional footballers actually be displayed on the basis of such activities?
The question is not a little “stupid”.
There are definitely judgments where particularly hard fouls led to convicts for assault during a football game.