In the El Bulo de Viviana segment of the Carnival streaming platform, Viviana Canosa He announced a television report to Javier Milei before his arrival at the presidency. In the fragment, the interviewers Guillermo Andino and Carolina Prat They investigate the family past of the libertarian economist and are bewildered by an anecdote.
“They started much below, both my dad and my mother. When my dad was two years old, my grandparents separated and had to row her from a very young age. My dad worked from a very young age, at three years old she already worked,” Milei confessed. Surprised by the answer, Prat rerected: “At what age?” The leader of La Libertad advances, without Dubitar, said: “From the age of three.”
The link between Milei and Canosa crossed different chapters, always framed in the tension between politics and media. During the first months of the libertarian irruption, the driver was one of the journalists who opened the doors of the screen more frequently. Milei participated in a recurring manner in his television cycle and found there a conducive space to display his confrontational style and his economic definitions without the filters of the most traditional interviews. At that stage, the economist won visibility and the journalist reaped rating with a guest who did not leave his audience indifferent.
By mid -2022 the friction began, when Canosa was critical of some positions of the then deputy and, above all, given the influence of the intimate circle of the libertarian, which he accused of manipulating his speech and filtering invitations to certain programs. The discomfort climbed from a public discussion in which Milei questioned her hard for having given space to opposition leaders that he considered “part of the caste.”
Since then, the distance became definitive. Milei stopped attending her program and on more than one occasion she criticized the driver, pointing her as part of a media scheme that tried to condition. For its part, the communicator was not far behind and began to highlight the changes in tone of the libertarian leader when approaching traditional political figures, accusing him of having abandoned the rebellion that had made him a television phenomenon.
Currently, the link is non -existent and, every time a cross reference arises, the rough tone predominates. The truth is that this rupture illustrates how the relationship between emerging leaders and journalists can change quickly when initial affinities dissipate and gain conflicting interests on the Argentine political and media board.
Image gallery
