Without context, it makes no sense to evaluate it.
Well, proactive violence doesn’t need a context, it’s always wrong.
And when you watch the video to the end, it doesn’t stop there. He wanted to storm into the stands and probably took off his jersey in “preparation” for this. You actually have to laugh at that. But because he was probably successfully held back, a Neanderthal gesture had to suffice in the end.
I saw the video too. I think that in order to evaluate this you actually need the context, although violence has always been and will remain the wrong tool.
But the video isn’t funny, there’s nothing to laugh about.
Either you reject proactive violence or you don’t. You obviously reject her too. How does the context change that? He didn’t have to defend himself against an attack (reactive violence). There are one or two comments under one of the videos that describe the situation.
And when a 29-year-old, grown man behaves in such an idiotic way, it’s not something to laugh about, that’s true, but it does amuse me. And it will probably be even more fun. the explanations from the club and especially Vavro himself: “That doesn’t reflect my values”, “everyone makes mistakes”