A survey of the consultant Streaming rating He analyzed the so -called “intense consumption”, which computes voluntary reactions to messages in X and Instagram. Both the “I like”, shared and saved in each publication, also added to the comments, beyond themselves are positive or negative with respect to the post, were the elements of study making focus on the two most relevant figures of national policy: Javier Milei and Cristina Kirchner.
“From the analysis of the data, it arises that Milei was the one who generated the greatest impact on his posts on March 21, the day in which the decision of the US government was announced. Uu. To prohibit Cristina Fernandez’s entry into that country (and in which the head of state debuted with the tweet”Che Cristina “). With two messages, Milei generated 263,100 reactions, against 80,400 that Cristina got in a post, headed again with the formula ‘Che, Milei’”, Stood out of the consultant.
But, also, they clarified: “On the side of Cristina, her message with greater arrival occurred on February 15, next day of the cryptogate scandal. That text came at 136,400 reactions, and had a ponytail three days later with another message that also reached a high level, although slightly lower (123 thousand reactions).”
The investigation developed by Rating Streaming accounted for the repercussions, both on X and Instagram, of the amplifiers of the ruling and opposition. From March 12 to 21 of the same month, 23,770,000 reactions were evaluated on the former Twitter and 11,509,000 in the main finish network, adding in total 35,279,600 reactions between the two networks. Within that temporal margin, the two protest marches of the retirees in Congress occurred.
The conclusion of the analysis agrees that reactions to the president’s tweets predominated Javier Milei On those of the former president Cristina Kirchner, with a total of 263,100 against 80,400. But, in the same paintings, it is also highlighted that the messages with the title “Che Milei” They had their peak on February 15, within the week of the Cryptogate, with 136,000 reactions and descending in the following posts averaging 60,000 and 80,000 per tweet.
As for Instagram, the ruling party predominated in that social network, even during the two marches of the retirees. Within the context of the demonstrations by Congress, the opposition managed to approach the numbers of the supporters of freedom progresses but without exceeding them. Concluding the review, the greatest advantage within those adherents to the libertarian government was consolidated on March 21, the day that the news was disseminated that the United States government prohibited access to the former president to its territory.
Probably, the amplifiers of the ruling party, who officiate activists in favor of Milei, are responsible for the balance to be balanced in favor of the economist. These users recognized with names such as translator, the Trumpist, preacher, Milei Shelby and Taliban, among others, called “trolls”, are already installed in the folklore of virtuality, establishing as popular figures of the political ecosystem of the networks.
Within the world of virtuality, the result so far, gives the winner to the libertarian leader over the Peronist referent. But, the non -forced errors of the head of the Executive Power, especially the tweet in which the president presented the Cryptocurrency $ Libra, positioned the former president within the digital landscape. A trend that can continue rising, depending on the opportunities that the leader of Union for the Homeland can take advantage and, also, the errors that the Government can self -life.
You may also interest you
Image gallery
