For example, they want to have Oldtimer’s motor vehicle tax paid. These cars are from hobbyists who only use their car for a few months a year. Who are less than 1000 kilometers per year, then everything goes back to the stable and they suspend these cars from the motor vehicle tax. That will cost the government more money than yield. That is why the motor vehicle tax was abolished at the time after recalions. Now, years later, they think they will get rich again. Thinking ‘jojobe policy’.
Higher wages, benefits and pensions: purchasing power plus not to be due to plans from The Hague
That’s how it goes with campers. They have to pay much more motor vehicle tax from next year. Most owners simply suspend them a little longer. Consequence, even less income. It is now starting to look more like not a hobby and want to prohibit it on vacation. It has nothing to do with well thought out policy. If things cost more money to introduce or keep it than they deliver, you shouldn’t do it. How simple can the calculation be?
Peter de Quaack, Vlissingen