Rocchi and the controversy: “Rigor’s bisseck. Gimenez da Rosso, it serves uniformity”

It was the penultimate of the championship: it seemed like some past films, that is another day in which bad moods, protests, recriminations and “bad thoughts” derailed the field to controversy and floods a little or open. “There is a lot of tension, very tight games but the referees – says Rocchi to Open Var – remain very lucid”.

anger inter

–

We come to the episodes starting from Inter-Lazio. The 1-1 goal is considered correct but all deceives the action of the assistant-1 Meli who considers Vecino on an impactful offside. Bandier raised, unwary. The position of Dia, on the other hand, is considered irrelevant. Moral: the assistant error and VAR that controls an offside that is not there. The penalty caused by Bisseck: it is judged such, both for the wide left arm and because the Nerazzurri defendant leads him to the ball. What about the guidance-avar issue? In audio, practically the whole Var, by Paolo. The externalizations regarding the “not refereeing Napoli” by the whistle of Torre Annunziata did not like at the top but in this case it seems that the Varista took over the whole decision. What about Inter? The anger remains, for the 1-1 (Dia is in front of everyone) and for the intervention of the VAR on the occasion of the penalty for the arm of Bisseck and not for Niche-Bisseck (and then there was the error by the VAR in not intervening). “Bisseck opens your arm, do you play life? We too” explains Chiffi to Barella after review. And Rocchi: “He widens his elbow and is a penalty to be assigned. Chiffi ok”.

Gimenez and Beukema: Rossi

–

On the other hand, the differentity detected between the championship and the final of the Italian Cup: the elbow of Gimenez to Mancini was (also according to the arbitration leaders) considered by red with the Var Mazzoleni which – also present at the Italian Cup final in the guise of Avar – had not contributed to considering in the same way that gesture (similar but perhaps not for intensity) Beukema -Gabbia. In short: you need a univocal line. “It is a violent conduct – says Rocchi – The ball is not played, Gimenez’s non -beautiful gesture, this is the way we must follow, it is necessary to be consistent and disincelivated these gestures. Beukema? It was less intense but it is the gesture: it was red”. Uniformity wanted.

Pasalic and Freuler

–

And then? For the leaders it was correct to remove the penalty with the Var in Parma-Napoli (for the previous foul, Marini and Aureliano Var and Avar), a touch of hand (Balogh) was not considered punishable in the same race. Meanwhile, Gianluca Rocchi, on the sidelines of a prize received in his career, says: “With Open Var if there is also a mistake we make it safely available to everyone. I don’t know how many categories are so open to admit the error, it seems that for us it should be done. Satisfied with the season? He has yet to finish the championship. I don’t give judgments”. Ah, backdating: for the leaders it was correct to cancel the penalt-koné penalty (“Objective is to reduce light penalties: one so cannot be granted” says Rocchi a Open Var) and was not a penalty Mc Kennie-Freuler. “Complex situation evaluated well by duties on the pitch – says Rocchi -. Freuler enters the defendant’s race line. The defense of the ball is a reading but you can see McKennie’s linear race”.