The defense received “one last time” postponement to try to get access to the file that, according to them, must show that there was hacking and unlawfully obtained evidence. The Public Prosecution Service stated that even if there were hacking, the evidence, according to the judiciary of the Court of Cassation, would still be valid.

The Supreme Court for the Justice (HRJ) reported on 3 March 2024 that there were indications that a member of the HRJ the Case of Criminal Law of the comparative admission exam in January of that year until the judicial internship, and the content of the improvement guide, delivered to a participant in advance. As a member of the Examination Board, the Ghent Advocate General CB gave the statement in advance to a trainee lawyer, who is the son of the Bruges Department Procurer YS and EW, judge in the Ypres Department of the West Flemish court of first instance.

ttn-40