Viktor Brand and Mr. Frank Visser pretends to be the rescuers of arguing the Netherlands, but there is a lot of suffering behind their cheerful TV show. Only after a large AD article intervenes Talpa. “Kleng.”
Ordinary people in the country who are somewhat more eccentric than the rest: they have been used by TV makers for years to score high viewing figures. That those people have no idea what the effects of such a TV performance are? That will be a sausage to them. Just have a contract signed and then you can use them limitless, they think in TV country.
Downright unethical
The tide has started to turn something in recent years, because more and more people just find this downright unethical. At SBS 6 they go one step further: there they use those people not only high viewing figures for one evening, but also in infinity as clickbait. The makers of Mr. Frank Visser makes a pronunciation now being exposed in it Ad.
TV judge Frank Visser and presenter Viktor Brand always do so fun and ordinary in front of the camera, but how rancid is it actually that they do not protect their candidates against themselves? That ‘ideal son -in -law’ Viktor calls himself a mediator, but behaves more as a petrol buyer in a burning conflict.
Ad is large
Today the AD is very big with an article about the abuses at Pandpole Court Frank Visser. ‘Dozens of participants mr. Frank Visser makes pronunciation struggling with aftermath:’ Our lives are upset ”, is the head of the critical piece. “Mediators, housing foundations and dozens of participants are critical.”
Large research has been done in the past year by the newspaper and of the 170 (!) Participants approached, 100 look back on their participation very negatively. Is that because they are not right? No. It is purely for how they are portrayed by the TV makers. But even worse: how they are then referred to online by SBS 6.
Bullying neighbors
Candidate Melissa gets to hear in her neighbor’s show: “They should have stuck it dead. I swear you. ” The TV makers enjoy it and film everything. And then they throw it on their YouTube channel with the roaring title: “Bullying peeing neighbors fear terrible escalation.”
Such a title is there until the end of time. To stay in the terms of Frank Visser: all those unsuspecting candidates get lifelong. Melissa, who won the case, finds it terrible to be indicated in this way: “It is not interested in SBS 6 how it comes to you as a participant.”
“They make you angry”
Of course, such a roaring title does not just come: the candidates must first get angry together. And according to dozens of candidates, this is controlled. “Install,” they call it. Former participant Michael: “I had to make my neighbor for a bastard, then I would seem authentic and credible.”
Ah, that again yielded a nice headline for SBS 6: ‘Woeste Buurman’ jumps from Vel: ‘Klootzak’. Unfortunately for the makers, Michael refuses. “You are manipulated and incited, made angry. They abuse your despair. ”
And former candidate Leo also happened to this: “The program makers wanted to let me tell things that I didn’t support.”
Bitch
The makers of the Frank Visser show go loose on YouTube with titles such as ‘Kleng Steel inheritance’ of ‘hating’ sisters, and: ‘Nasty, scary neighbor demands land!’. Or: “Old screaming” is crazy about ‘nightclub criminal’! ‘
Ordinary people who are portrayed by SBS 6 for the rest of their lives as a ‘bitch’, as ‘sneaky, scary neighbor’ … Of course, Fouter is not possible. And apparently they feel caught at Talpa, because the AD writes: “During the investigation of this newspaper, the headline on YouTube was adjusted. “The legacy passes by these sisters” is now there. “
Terror neighbor
And so Talpa has adjusted all kinds of titles in all almost. “Even in at least twenty other videos are the headers made by Talpa such as ‘Zeikwijf’, ‘disgusting neighbor’, ‘terrible neighbor’, ‘Bridezilla’, ‘Terrorbuurman’, ‘Keng’ and ‘Egotripper has now taken away rules’, it appears from screenshots that this newspaper has saved.”
And what do those ‘hating’ sisters think? Solange, one of it, says: “They want to make a much -discussed episode with sensational images and shocking statements. The images are then placed on the internet with incitinated suggestive texts, to be viewed forever, everything for the viewing figures. It’s outrageous. “
Frank Visser judges with a gown, SBS 6 then publicly executs on YouTube. Should this not just stop in 2025?
Ad-article
The AD article in question: