Has this Aluhut community have been around for a long time or has it spilled over the time of Facebook, Instagram and Twitter?
Even if there was actually one or the other transfer where you could shake your head and talk about “weaknesses”, as a rule this is a side effect.
Why should you invest tens of millions in any miracle bags just to possibly stand with a minus or flop?
Of course you sometimes also look into your own league and look whether one or the other player does not fit your team
If it even fits into the system, makes the team stronger or wider the squad itself, you have to worry and possibly start an attempt.
Wirtz would do well without discussion of every team on this world.
Shouldn’t you deal with him just because he comes from a club from your own league?
Tah (who has a good level and years of Bundesliga experience) did not want to extend his contract regardless of a possible move to Bavaria .. shouldn’t you still worry about your personnel just because he comes from a potential competitor?
Schick is a rather effective striker and apart from one or the other injury always there when you need it and in the form of goals. Shouldn’t you think about him because he plays in another jersey, but which belongs to a team from the same league?
Whether he would really come to FC Bayern if a Kane plays there and even though he said that he wanted to play a tribe, it remains to be seen.
In 1-2 years you can certainly think about it again, because Kane doesn’t get younger either.
Tah could easily record the three -way battle with Kim and UPA and who knows what Kompany is planning in terms of system technology.
And that Wirtz is the talent of recent years is out of the question.
So people, remove aluminum and sometimes think rationally instead of just lifting their fingers and realizing themselves over the “perpeased, cösen” FC Bayern.
It is not about whether you can basically sign players from the Bundesliga or even from the direct competitor. Of course, an association like FC Bayern should and should watch the market, even in its own league. However, the criticism is directed against the systematic weaknesses of the competition, which has been repeatedly observed in recent years – and not only randomly or isolated, but noticeable regularly.
You have to ask yourself: Why is it striking that key players from the direct competition at Bavaria end up – whether it was Götze, Lewandowski, Hummels, Sabitzer, Laimer or Upamecano? All of these are not a “random transfer”, but an expression of a pattern. The impression arises – whether wanted or not – that Bavaria not only uses its position in terms of sport, but also economically in order to specifically core potential pursuers.
It is obvious that this does not happen from pure calculation, but also out of a strategic advantage: it is not just a sporting reinforcement, but at the same time a weakening of the opponent. And that is exactly what the legitimate criticism produces. In other leagues – such as the Premier League – this phenomenon is far less likely to be observed, although the clubs are similarly financially strong there.
The term “aluhut community” is out of place here. Criticism of market -distorting structures within the Bundesliga has nothing to do with conspiracy theories, but with a differentiated view of the competition. If a league wants to be attractive and balanced in sports, it cannot be the goal that the series master regularly pulls out the best players’ best players. This is poison for tension and competition.
Wirtz is undoubtedly a world-class talent-but that is precisely why his move to Munich would be a fatal signal. It would once again show that the sporting rise of a club is ultimately capped in the Bundesliga as soon as Bavaria knocks. This can be criticized without being banished to the “Bayern-Hasser” camp.
If you really think rationally, you should question the overall dynamics – not only whether the transfer for FC Bayern would make sense.
If you read the beginning, then I mention mentioned side effects of a possible weakening ..
That in front.
Especially since this overall dynamics in the “Bayern buy the league” and “weaken the competition” exactly where can be found?
These are both extremes, but only one makes sense. The arguments of the haters actually only make sense if Bavaria has nothing better to do than just to cut millions of euros to keep the opponent small.
Rather, the reason for such purchases is more likely that these players may fit well into the system, showed great potential and that FC Bayern could also offer their forehead in some form ..
But of course that makes no or little sense or does the overall dynamics not do well again, what?
But let’s go into the players mentioned:
Götze .. So the top talent at the time had been specifically bought away, just to weaken Dortmund? Götze who had an AK that everyone could have pulled? Will be so.
Lewandowski, already a goal machine with announcement that did not want to extend his contract regardless of the interest of Bavaria and was even more in contact with Real, so was only or primarily brought to weaken the competition?
Hummels, who was previously at Bavaria and was therefore still in the field of vision, developed splendidly and with Boateng the regulars IV of the national team was also brought to weakening?
I do not deny that the side effect of weakening occurred – as already mentioned in my comment, but
Götze was more than promising at the time, both in Dortmund and in the national team. He also had an AK .. Of course, Bayern grabs when you can.
Lewandoswski was a executor who almost looked for his kind at the time. And free of charge.
Of course you get that. In his case, you also “sabotaged” Real Madrid than Dortmund. And Hummels was also a German international and that Bavaria generally has a soft spot for such players is and was nothing new at the time.
Sabitzer presented himself well, with a strong urge on the offensive and was intended as a relief for Kimmich and Goretzka. Laimer came from Nagelsmann at the request of Nagelsmann, from whom you had hoped for a lot.
Nagelsmann himself was a promising trainer and specialist who also fit well into the Bavarian profile. Upamecano was young, triggered and a fresh wind in the aging Bavaria IV.
For many of the mentioned, it was also the next logical step and quite successful.
Have you actually wondered what the player wanted or is it primarily about weakening?
Are the changes themselves so reprehensible when the players stay in the league, but wanted to go to the best club there? Before you switch to another top league?