HSV buys Mario Vuskovic – Lower fee negotiated with Hajduk Split?

Quote from Hamboi

Quote from HomerOmer

Quote from Hamboi

I’m not as sure I’m as big a fan of this decision as the rest here. You buy a young central defender for a huge mountain of money, who is loaned out for 2 years anyway, and thus plays with us next season anyway, just to keep the team together as a whole?
The numbers between 3 and 5 million that are haunted here by the against are gigantic sums by our standards.
And that in a season in which we again had to accept huge sales losses thanks to Corona.

I wouldn’t have exercised the option until his second season at some point.

The only reasons I can think of to pull them now are:

1. The option is only valid for the first year of rental (contradicts everything that has been heard)
2. They want to sell him for a quick profit this summer (contradicts what was said about keeping the team together)

So I don’t really understand it. I thought the time for hasty decisions based on media and fan hype was over. That’s how you can go wrong.

Once again, we are just one injury away from unnecessarily digging the next million dollar grave.

Hope everything goes well.

Stay healthy Mario!

If you don’t sign him and he changes and is then resold for a lot of money, the screaming is big again. You can’t please everyone.

Vusko is 20 years old, is already one of the strongest duels in IV in the second BuLi, in which things like to be tougher, also has a wonderful player opening and is hot for victory in every game.

You don’t buy a worn-out professional, but a player who is promising. In addition, with regard to today’s transfers, the investment is far from high.

It’s popular to question everything HSV does, but at this point it would be appropriate to do so in a constructive manner.

Which footballer is spared from injuries? In addition, today’s injuries are no longer career-ending. That shouldn’t be an argument, because then you wouldn’t be able to spend more money on any player.

We can only be congratulated on having landed such a player for this money. Because I am firmly convinced that he will bring a big transfer plus or will lead us to better times together with others.

The decision is hardly based on hype, just tune in for a change and watch games.

He doesn’t just change away, he’s been loaned out for two years. Why oblige him now if you still have him there for 15 months and you can take the option, for example, in 12 months?

What will change for us in the next 12 months, apart from the fact that you have to take the risk yourself if you injure yourself more seriously and you can no longer lower the price as a result?

But it’s ok, I’m also happy that he wants to stay here in the long term, but I’m just skeptical about the timing.

Somehow I have the development of van Drongelen on my mind all the time.
Maybe I’m just scared, but I remain skeptical even though I enjoy Vuskovic in game as much as you do

It actually makes no difference on the balance sheet.
The transfer fee is now written off over the term of the contract anyway.
So that the club has an additional burden, at least for this year, which does not reflect the full transfer fee.

Of course I understand that you take Van Drongelen, but I actually rate him as much more limited than Vusko in terms of football.

I suspect the current timing is simply based on Split needing the money now. You can still push the price down now. If he continues to play like this, he will make himself more attractive for higher tasks anyway. If this is the case, you now have everything under control and can negotiate freely with potential buyers.

That’s why I think the transfer is actually quite low-risk, especially with regard to the ending corona crisis and returning viewers who can absorb such a transfer accordingly.

ttn-38