Ric Edelman advises investors from the traditional 60/40 portfolio. Otherwise, the savings in old age would not be sufficient, warns the financial expert.
• 60/40 portfolio should offer financial security in retirement
• Ric Edelman does not see this with high life expectancy
• The financial expert advises other solutions
A 60/40 portfolio is considered the ultimate of a diversified and balanced investment portfolio for rather defensive investors who are too risky for whom a pure stock portfolio is too risky. It is intended for long -term financial security in retirement and owes its name to its composition because 60 percent are reserved for stocks and 40 percent for bonds.
But recently the voices that consider this classic portfolio to be outdated. Larry Fink, CEO of the world’s largest asset manager Blackrock,, for example, advised in his annual letter to investors to invest in private assets such as hedge funds and real estate in 2025. His proposal: In his opinion, investors should invest 50 percent in shares, 30 percent in bonds and 20 percent in private assets – sometimes also known as alternative systems.
Increasing life expectancy
Ric Edelman, the former director of Edelman Financial Engines, also advises other solutions. This is due to the fact that the expert is expecting further breakthroughs in medicine and science – such as neuroscience, bioinformatics, 3D printing, robotics and artificial intelligence – and is therefore extremely optimistic about the future life expectancy of people. “We live in human history for more than ever before,” he told CNBC. “You should put up your financial planning as if you were 100 years old,” he advises, because “in the next 30 years people will become routinely 100 years and older”.
With such a acceptance of life expectancy, a 60/40 portfolio cannot deliver sufficient capital. “The probability is high that the money will run out,” warned Ric Edelman in the program “Etf Edge” and therefore made a hard judgment on the 60/40 portfolio: “It is dead because of the longevity”.
Suggested solutions
For long -term oriented investors who are concerned with their old -age insurance, this means that a larger proportion of assets should be invested in shares than ever. Edelman considers a share of 70 to 80 percent to be appropriate if investors do not want to take the risk of surviving their savings.
Another proposed solution from him are so-called Bond Ladder ETFs, which invest in US state bonds with a very short time of up to 30 years. You can pay interest over a wide range of terms and give the capital back to investors if individual bonds within the ladder are due. Since these ETFs offer a guaranteed lifelong income, they are suitable to counter the problem of increasing life expectancy.
Editor finance.net
By the way: US shares can even be traded at Finance.net Zero until 11 p.m. (without order fees, plus spreads). Open Depot now for free And receive a free stock as a gift.