Eva Jinek must be able to earn more money than the current salary ceiling of 246 thousand euros, says royalty expert Jeroen Snel from RTL Boulevard. “Then she doesn’t have to schnibble.”
There is a lot to do about the Schnabbels of Eva Jinek, the journalistic sign of the NPO. Why does she have to have three months off if she is the spacious day chairman all summer? She already works part -time and if she apparently does not need that long summer rest, then she can also just make some extra episodes?
Schnabbelqueen
Bridget Maasland prompts it in the RTL Boulevard from last night. “While her talk show is standing still, Eva Jinek runs overtime. She Schnabbelt is nice and loose,” it sounds. “She is regularly at congresses as chairman of the day and that kind of schnabbels yield a pretty tasty pocket money.”
Voice-over Jeroen In De Vegte, the ‘scanty’ talk show salary of Eva looks at: 246 thousand euros per year. “It may not be surprising that this talk showqueen here and there Schnabbelt. At the NPO, she strokes more than a million euros less in salary every year than she does at RTL.”
Money problems
TV authority Tina Nijkamp points out in an item that Eva really has no money worries. “Eva of course went back in salary. Whether she is doing it, I don’t know. I think she is doing well and she deserves a few tons a year of course.”
That is a lot of money, she thinks. “Yes, who can say that in the Netherlands? So she won’t have any money problems, but I think she thinks: well, I’m not going on vacation yet, why should I not take this along?”
Ahold-Bobo
Eva recently presented an advertisers gala, which was funded by Albert Heijn. “Can you still, suppose there will be something with Ahold soon and that director will come to the table at Eva, with that conflict of interest a good interview?”, Asks show connoisseur Aran Bade. “I think Eva can schnabble, why not? But look at it critically by schnabbel.”
Royalty expert Jeroen Snel indicates that the leave diva simply does not earn enough. “I agree with Eva, it is in her contract, but if you are a NPO presenter-I also see a NOS Journal presenter-then it should not be possible, but that is due to those low salaries in proportion.”
“More money for Eva!”
Eva needs more money, says Jeroen. “Just pay them a little more, are going to reduce the number of presenters so that it is all still financed in time of cuts and just make sure that Eva does not have to do that. Then you are rid of it and you can keep them exclusively for the NPO.”
The Tiara gluizer concludes: “If she earns her current salary again three times, then that trigger is of course gone for her to do things like this.”

