“My best friend, since elementary school, is Claudio Ferreño, the right hand of Alberto Fernandez”, he began recounting Walter Santiago, “The Alpha” from Big Brother who claimed to know the President “35 years ago”.
“I have known Alberto for 35 years. Alberto Fernández bribed me a lot of times. I know Alberto Fernández very well, “said the participant while he chatted with another of the members of the house of the telefe reality show and sparked controversy on social media.
President Alberto Fernandezthe presidential spokeswoman Gabriela Cerutiand finally Gregorio Dalbon, attorney for the president, responded on Twitter. “Notwithstanding what was said by the presidential spokeswoman and in case the insult to the President of the Nation, Alberto Fernández, persists, he instructed me to initiate civil actions for damage to his honor,” Dalbón wrote in his account.
Making the issue a priority was criticized by Twitter users, opposition figures, but also by some referents of the communication of the Front of All, such as John Courelone of those responsible for the campaign of the ruling coalition in 2019. “You They do not understand the pain with which I laugh at all this“, he wrote on his Twitter account after making several ironic comments. “I understand you. I saw you work so hard in 2019…”, he replied albert samid.
“I cannot get into how each one defends his honor, what the Big Brother member said must have made a dent in Alberto Fernández and that is why it came out as it did. Sometimes things happen by primal instinct that grabs you when you see these things, maybe if you think about a communication strategy it wasn’t the right thing to do. But I can’t get involved in primary reactions either when one is not corrupt,” he said. Eduardo Valdés in The Trigger (Delta 90.3).
“I have many differences with Alberto Fernández at this time, about how I handle the last cabinet change, it hurts me that he did not participate in an act on October 17 as the president of the Justicialist party, but I put my hands in the fire for him. That’s why I have a look from that place, when one claims the innocence of things over everything that falls to you like this, perhaps it comes out in a way that would not have been done thinking about the strategy”, he insisted, implying that the president was more impulsive than strategic.
“Regarding this issue with the differences that I have, I say that a reaction is logical when someone is accused of things they never imagined that could happen. If he remained silent, the one who is silent grants. Many more people may have found out than they should have, but if one claims innocence let everyone find out. If Alberto Fernández did not come out to respond, it was also going to be a problem,” Valdés concluded.
by RN
