Regulatory changes for autonomous vehicles are being discussed in the USA. President Trump’s transition team is proposing to eliminate the reporting requirement for accidents involving autonomous or semi-autonomous vehicles that NHTSA implemented in 2021. Tesla in particular criticized the guidelines, which raised questions about possible influence.
• The 2021 regulation is intended to record accidents with activated driving systems
• Tesla criticizes the regulation as disproportionate and inhibiting innovation
• Decision could affect competition in autonomous vehicles
The current reporting requirement and its meaning
The regulation, introduced in the US in 2021, requires car manufacturers to report within 24 hours any accident in which an autonomous driving system or an advanced driver assistance system such as Tesla’s “Autopilot” was active in the last 30 seconds before the incident. This data is intended to enable NHTSA, the US civil authority for road and vehicle safety, to identify safety problems at an early stage and to order measures such as recalls or technical adjustments. Since the reporting requirement was introduced, thousands of accidents have been reported, of which Tesla alone has documented over 1,500.
The rule also plays a critical role in assessing the safety of new technologies, Reuters reported in an online post. The data collected helps to not only identify specific errors, but also to highlight broader trends in the use and risks of such systems.
Tesla and the criticism of the regulation
Tesla has been one of the most vocal critics of the reporting requirement. The company argued that the regulation imposes a disproportionate burden and distorts its safety record. According to Tesla, advanced technologies such as “Autopilot” naturally attract more regulatory and media attention, which creates a negative image in public perception.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk described the regulation as a “bureaucratic hurdle” that hinders innovation. NHTSA data shows that Tesla reported the most accidents of any manufacturer since the reporting requirement was introduced, including fatal collisions. However, critics emphasize that this frequency is due to the spread of Tesla’s technologies and their intensive use.
Trump transition team pushes for abolition
US President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team has now recommended abolishing the reporting requirement completely. A published memorandum said the rule would lead to excessive data collection, which would burden manufacturers and slow the adoption of new technologies. Instead, it is proposed to develop a federal framework that is less bureaucratic and more focused on voluntary reporting.
This proposal has reignited the debate around safety and innovation in the field of autonomous vehicles. While manufacturers of (partially) autonomous vehicles such as Tesla and the Alphabet subsidiary Waymo welcome the proposal, security experts warn of possible risks if important data is no longer systematically recorded.
Safety concerns and ethical issues
The NHTSA and independent safety experts sharply criticize the Trump transition team’s move. They argue that eliminating the reporting requirement would severely limit the agency’s ability to assess potential risks associated with automated driving systems. Without this data, important safety issues could go undetected, which could reduce the number of recalls and adjustments but increase the risk of accidents.
Ethical issues also come into play. The close ties between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and the Trump transition team raise questions about possible conflicts of interest. Musk, who has financially supported the Trump campaign, has been tapped for an advisory role on government innovation, reinforcing the impression of direct influence on regulatory decisions.
Implications for the development of autonomous technologies
The potential elimination of reporting requirements could have a significant impact on the future of autonomous vehicles. Proponents argue that deregulation could accelerate innovation by reducing the administrative burden on manufacturers. Critics, however, warn that this could jeopardize the security of the technologies and consumer trust.
Manufacturers such as Ford Motor and General Motors are watching developments closely as they too could benefit from easing regulations. Competition in the autonomous vehicle space is intense, and regulatory changes could determine who takes market leadership in the next few years.
Editorial team finanzen.net
Selected leverage products on Alphabet C (ex Google)
With knock-outs, speculative investors can participate disproportionately in price movements. Simply select the lever you want and we will show you suitable open-end products on Alphabet C (ex Google)
The leverage must be between 2 and 20
Advertising