Daphne Bunskoek believes that John de Mol is very much holding his reality star Peter Gillis. “Mick van Wely is immediately put on non-active. I think that’s hypocritical,” she says.
It is good for Peter Gillis that his reality series cannot be seen at RTL, because they had all made him the door. John de Mol, however, holds firmly to the camping boss, because a fifteenth season has been announced by Massa is Kassa. And that is surprising at the outside world: what is that with that Gillis cuddling?
Unclosed
Jeroen Kijk in the Vegte, the voice-over of RTL Boulevard, finds it striking. “Although the judge considers it proven that there is years of tampering with the administration of the Oostappen Group, that is no reason for SBS 6 to delete the soap, which has been on TV since 2020,” he says in the show section on RTL 4.
Talpa says in a response: “Talpa Network is still of the opinion that someone is only guilty if there is a definitive conviction by the court. There is no question of this as long as an appeal is possible.”
“I’m proud”
Peter laughs in his fist. “John de Mol, I am proud of him. Yet again trust in the Gillis family, despite all the negative publicity.”
TV connoisseur Rob Goossens: “We’ve been surprised for a long time that SBS 6 will let this go, but it is consistent, because they have indeed said,” Until there is an irrevocable conviction, we see him as innocent. ” That can take so long, that in principle transcends the expiration date of the soap. “
Hypocritical
Daphne Bunskoek finds John de Mol a bit hypocritical. “It is also a bit hypocritical of statement. I mean: Mick van Wely was immediately put on non-active yesterday, right? I don’t know if it was irrevocably convicted.”
Rob: “No, he is not, so for one more rules than for the other.”
Daphne: “So it might be the popularity for your channel.”
Inappropriate
Peter says he wants to fill his soap with all the lawsuits playing. Inappropriate, crime journalist Jermaine Ellenkamp thinks it. “Legal cases, certainly abusing mistreatment, criminal cases, as a revenue model, that is just really poignant, if you have the goal.”
There are plenty of reasons to put that man aside, he says. “He can really have quartets with statements, because of course he has had that tax fraud case. He was sentenced to a six -month prison sentence for a year in prison. He then also has a case that is about Nicol’s alleged abuses.”
Abuse
It is really just about a mistreatment case, Jermaine emphasizes. “There are also tax fraud fines. Two weeks ago he received a substantial fine of 1.5 million from the tax authorities in connection with tourist tax.”
“He also has a number of other things about his parks and then I will probably forget something.”