The Rossoneri coach after the 2-2 draw with Pisa: “It’s a question of growth, of understanding the moments of the match, and tonight we had to do that. We had to be faster and more clear-headed”

Journalist

October 24, 2025 (changed at 11.57pm) – MILAN

About some things, he was right. On the eve of Max Allegri had received heated warnings about the dangers of meeting another newly promoted team after the poor showing in August against Cremonese, he had invited everyone to avoid words like escape and had explained to the point of exhaustion that Pisa were a grumpy opponent, as the 2-2 draw at San Siro demonstrated. On others the Rossoneri coach had to change his mind because his Milan this time was a team without intensity and with (much) less soul than usual, if we exclude the last minutes of the match played more with their guts than with their heads. During the match, those on the sidelines heard him point the finger several times at the weakness of his team, even when the Rossoneri were 1-0 up. And at the end of the first round he invited the team to wake up. The message was anything but received: Milan returned to the pitch soft and relaxed after the break. An obvious step backwards in terms of attitude, rather than opportunities: there have been many and if someone between Leao, Nkunku and Saelemaekers had thrown it in the second time, that weakness would not become the central point of the analysis.

too long

“We’re happy with the draw, but we made a mistake once we took the lead – the coach said after the match -: we should have ended the match with the second goal. After the 1-0 we could have made it 2-0, using more serenity. The serenity of the strong. Instead we were too long, the strikers were too far apart and there were too many holes in the middle. We went to get the ball forward, not all together, but by stretching ourselves. In the end it would have been enough to make two actions right to win, without losing your head. It’s a question of growth, of understanding the moments of the match, and tonight we had to do that. We had to be faster and clearer. Pisa exploited our weaknesses well. However, despite the results, not everything was going well: that’s why I say we need to keep working. In the long run, today’s point will prove to be difficult for the achievement of our objective.”




ttn-14