Do we ever see Natacha Harlequin on the tube as a TV personality? After two failed interviews, that opportunity seems minimal, says media aritor Victor Vlam. “She should have said sorry.”
Natacha Harlequin lingers very stubbornly in her own right. All that hassle with Ali B – she suddenly started praising him in Shownieuws when he was her on the payroll had set – according to her it was only blown up by the media. And her statement that there would be a ‘bomb’ in favor of Ali? Also made up by the media, she calls.
Bought chair
Communication expert Lars Duursma states that it is really obvious that Natacha acted wrong. “Those roles were mixed up, because at one point she started to defend Ali B in the broadcast,” he says in the podcast The Communicado’s.
Then the criticism erupted. “Because via Natacha Harlequin, Ali had actually bought a chair in Shownieuws to tell his side of the story. With that she has ashamed of the trust of the public and the program has therefore ashamed the trust of the public. ”
Media offensive
Colleague Victor Vlam notices that Natacha has now used a very ‘offensive’ to return to the media. She held a cry interview with Patty Brard and hung a two -hour chat story at Fernando Halman, the most uncritical interviewer of the Western Hemisphere. The latter interview is really not to get through, he says.
Victor: “She thinks she was incorrectly punished for what happened, but if I had to summarize two or three sentences why she thinks so … I don’t know! That is a bit of the problem. It is a very long story, but the message is very unclear. You need something that you can easily summarize. ”
False
It is a mistake by Natacha to sit down with such an uncritical Robbert Rodenburg-like interviewer, says Victor. “She had no critical interviewer. Fernando Halman hardly interrupted in the first hour. If you add everything together, he might have been speaking for three minutes. Really hardly. “
For example, a critical interviewer could have pointed out Natacha that she is joking about that ‘bomb’. Although she did not say that a ‘bomb would drop’, but it is literally: “I think the twelfth and thirteenth is just a bomb bursting.”
“Exactly the same!”
Victor finds that struggle for words a weakness. “That’s exactly the same, isn’t it? So why on earth do you grab that point to show that you were quoted incorrectly? That doesn’t matter. It seems to me as if she is a bit too stuck in her own right. “
“You see that more often when people start to believe that the world is against them and that they are the ultimate right. Then they cling into very small details and say: ‘You see! That’s not right! “
Media career
Can Natacha ever go back on TV? “So she wants a media career. Whether she will still get it afterwards? To be honest, I find it quite difficult to think about what that could look like. It is two interviews that failed, so those with Patty and those with Fernando Halman. It is a clearly damaged image she has. “
“What should she do then? I don’t see her being asked so quickly for another television program and she is not welcome at Shownieuws. I also don’t see her join Boulevard, because they already have someone else to explain legal affairs. What is the sequel to that media career? I find it very difficult to see. “
Sorry
What would he have done Natacha? How could things have been to save? “She should have apologized. She is apparently not at the point that she is able to do so, but everyone just thinks it’s wrong. ”
“It lives massively. Just say that you made a stupid mistake and put yourself over it. “