Hannover 96: Martin Kind with yes or no? No response to club management

“Rules of the game” of the meeting

Professional football boss Martin Kind did not disclose his much-discussed voting behavior in the German Football League (DFL) investor deal to the parent club Hannover 96. This was confirmed by the managing director and majority shareholder of the spun-off professional company “Neue Presse” in Hanover.

The leadership of Hannover 96 eV, which is dominated by Kind opponents, received the required statement from him on Wednesday, said Kind. The 79-year-old entrepreneur kept to himself whether he voted yes or no. “I answered that it was a secret ballot – and I stick to that,” he said. Those were “the rules of the game” of the DFL general meeting.


Community
Join the discussion about Hannover 96
This way!

At the meeting on Monday, the umbrella organization of the 36 German professional clubs approved the entry of a strategic partner with exactly the required two-thirds majority. There were 24 yes votes, ten no votes and two abstentions among the clubs. And the fact that the last twelve clubs have publicly acknowledged their voting behavior at least suggests that Kind voted yes for the 96ers. He himself only told “Bild”: “Nobody knows whether the clubs that are now declaring that they voted no actually voted that way.”

DFL only sees Kind’s voting behavior as a problem for Hannover 96

Kind’s approval of the investor entry would be piquant for two reasons: On the one hand, the parent club had given the professional managing director instructions to vote no. This is exactly what the eV is entitled to under the so-called “50+1” rule in German professional football. This stipulates that the parent clubs must still retain the right to issue instructions and the majority of votes even if the professional area has been spun off into a corporation.

TV money rankings 2023/24: Newcomers receive up to 22.5 million more

18 Darmstadt 98 | Revenue: €32.5 million

&copy IMAGO

+€17.9 million

Preliminary figures according to the “Kicker”. Income from national and international TV marketing, for which the successes of the last five or ten years are fundamental. The use of young players, fan interest and base amounts also count.

17 1. FC Heidenheim | Revenue: €36.1 million

&copy IMAGO

+€22.5 million

16 VfL Bochum | Revenue: €38.4 million

&copy IMAGO

+€5.1 million

15 Werder Bremen | Revenue: €41.5 million

&copy IMAGO

+€4.7 million

14 VfB Stuttgart | Revenue: €43.9 million

&copy IMAGO

+€2.2 million

13 FC Augsburg | Revenue: €45.3 million

&copy IMAGO

+€1.1 million

12 1. FC Cologne | Revenue: €51.7 million

&copy IMAGO

+€0.8 million

11 Mainz 05 | Revenue: €52.2 million

&copy IMAGO

unchanged

10 TSG Hoffenheim | Revenue: €55.9 million

&copy IMAGO

-€7.1 million

9 Gladbach | Revenue: €60.6 million

&copy IMAGO

-€6.1 million

8 VfL Wolfsburg | Revenue: €62.5 million

&copy IMAGO

-€1.8 million

7 SC Freiburg | Revenue: €64.1 million

&copy IMAGO

+€7.8 million

6 Union Berlin | Revenue: €66 million

&copy IMAGO

+€11.1 million

5 Eintracht Frankfurt | Revenue: €74.1 million

&copy IMAGO

+€0.6 million

4 RB Leipzig | Revenue: €77.6 million

&copy IMAGO

-€0.7 million

3 Bayer 04 | Revenue: €78.5 million

&copy IMAGO

+€3.0 million

2 BVB | Revenue: €80.8 million

&copy IMAGO

+€0.7 million

1 FC Bayern | Revenue: €90 million

&copy IMAGO

-€0.2 million

A yes vote from Kind against the parent club’s instructions would therefore also be a further indication that the “50+1” rule can no longer be enforced at Hannover 96. The eV leadership had already tried to remove Kind as professional managing director last year – and failed in two courts.

I just want to hope that child voted yes. I don’t want to be a fan of these clubs that still live in the last century and believe that marketing and investment from outside is the work of the devil. Such clubs have no place in the Bundesliga. …

Quote

The management of the DFL only sees Kind’s voting behavior as an internal problem. However, the management of Hannover 96 eV accuses the DFL of not sufficiently ensuring that its own “50+1” rule still applies to the club. “This right to give instructions was not observed by Mr. Kind on several occasions,” said a board member of the “German Press Agency”.

To home page

ttn-38