Exclusive Student Offer

Prime for Young Adults

Get a 6-month trial with premium college perks & fast delivery.

Start Free Trial
Listen Anywhere

Audible Standard Trial

Get 30 days of audiobooks free. Cancel anytime, keep your books.

Claim Free Books

The recent departure of Lisette Wellens from her role as a presenter on “Goedemorgen Nederland” has sparked considerable discussion. Notably, her exit is surprising because she currently has no new job lined up. This unusual decision raises questions about the wisdom of such a move.

© WNL

Team Restructuring at WNL

The team behind “Goedemorgen Nederland” is undergoing significant changes. The quartet of presenters, including Frank van Leeuwen, Welmoed Sijtsma, Lisette Wellens, and Sam Hagens, is now disbanded. While three of them were invited to audition for RTL 4’s new late talk show, Lisette was not deemed suitable by the channel’s executives.

Emotional Fallout

The aftermath of Welmoed’s selection for the new show seemingly created a tense atmosphere at WNL. Reports suggest that Lisette spent two weeks “crying on the couch,” feeling overlooked while her colleagues moved forward. Frank was noted as being supportive, but the dynamics among the team were undoubtedly affected.

As the new TV season approaches, the departure of Lisette raises eyebrows—especially since she has no confirmed next steps. This situation brings to light the question: Was this a wise choice?

A Decision of Personal Choice

Lisette has publicly stated that her decision to leave was entirely her own. In her own words, “I decided to stop as the presenter of Goedemorgen Nederland and leave WNL. There wasn’t enough room to realize my ambitions, and what I can contribute as a journalist wasn’t fully utilized.” After nine years, she felt it was time to move on.

On Instagram, she expressed relief at her decision but acknowledged the difficulty of leaving her “morning family.” While she is focusing on completing her book and seeking new freelance opportunities, it’s clear that her future direction remains uncertain.

Implications of Leaving Without a Safety Net

When asked whether there would be a final broadcast, Lisette confirmed her immediate departure, indicating that she had already wrapped up her last show. Critics have noted that walking away from a secure position without alternative job prospects is a risky gamble, likening it to “jumping into the deep end.”

Victor Vlam, a well-known TV critic, commented on the unusual nature of Lisette’s departure, suggesting that it indicates potential underlying issues at WNL. The fact that three out of four presenters had auditions without her could imply she was viewed as the least valuable member of the team.

Toxic Work Environment?

Vlam also hinted at a potentially troubling atmosphere behind the scenes at WNL. He speculated that her absence from auditions could correlate with a negative workplace culture, impacting morale among the staff. If Lisette felt the need to leave, it might highlight an environment where staying became increasingly untenable.

In summary, Lisette Wellens’ choice to resign from WNL without securing another position has led to a myriad of questions and insights regarding her professional journey. It raises concerns about the state of the workplace, the importance of personal fulfillment, and the inherent risks of navigating a career in television. Whether her decision proves to be advantageous or detrimental remains to be seen.

Get Audible 30-Day Free Trial

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.