The Drenthe Boermarks want to become more involved in the social debate about nitrogen, nature, water and the future of the countryside. According to the organization, it is essential that farmers and residents are structurally involved in the design of the rural area.
“Farmers are not only food producers, but also managers of the landscape, carriers of the regional economy and part of the social structure of the countryside,” according to de Boermarken.
According to the Drenthe Boermarken, the debate about nitrogen and nature is in danger of becoming increasingly one-sided, while the consequences of the policy extend beyond just the agricultural sector. The organization points out that contractors, transport companies, installers, suppliers and other rural companies also feel the consequences when farms come under pressure.
As examples, the Boermarken cite stagnant licensing, growing uncertainty for entrepreneurs and declining quality of life. They also fear the departure of companies and economic activity from the region.
In addition, the Boermarks question the independence of parts of the public debate surrounding nitrogen and biodiversity. “A situation is increasingly arising in which research, interpretation and conclusions take place within the same small circle of organizations and stakeholders. Then you may ask how broad and independent the debate actually is.”
According to the Drenthe Boermarken, the debate about nitrogen, nature and the future of the countryside must be conducted in a broader and more balanced way, with more attention to the quality of life in villages and the countryside.
The organization emphasizes that it is not against nature policy or sustainability. “We want to contribute ideas about biodiversity, water management and future-proof agriculture. But on the basis of facts, realism, voluntariness and mutual respect.”
The Boermarks want to be more visible to politics, media and society in the coming period. They want to respond more often to developments and voice dissent where necessary. According to the organization, this is not intended to increase polarization, but to ensure that the story of farmers and the countryside is fully included in the public debate.