Exclusive Student Offer

Prime for Young Adults

Get a 6-month trial with premium college perks & fast delivery.

Start Free Trial
Listen Anywhere

Audible Standard Trial

Get 30 days of audiobooks free. Cancel anytime, keep your books.

Claim Free Books

In principle it is a sensible approach, because as the most recent example has shown, covering the mouth offers a lot of scope for interpretation and in the end it is more or less statement against statement.

But where do you want to draw the line here? It is common practice for players to now cover their mouths with their hands during any conversation. Most of the time it’s about making sure that some ditzy lip reader doesn’t come along again and what’s said can be hyped up into a scandal. Think of Müller (Can this shit stop?).

But of course insults can also be said that only the addressee notices, as (perhaps) happened in the Prestianni case. So how should it be decided whether keeping one’s mouth shut is a punishable offense?
If the opponent says that he was insulted in this conversation?

That would open the door to false accusations. Given the way the football circus currently looks, it is not difficult to imagine that something like this would be used specifically to harm the opponent.

Therefore, I think that no practical solution will be found to penalize an opponent with red for simply speaking behind closed doors.

ttn-38

Get Audible 30-Day Free Trial

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.