The action was carried out by the Gruppo Verde San Siro Association and by over one hundred inhabitants of the neighborhood after Palazzo Marino gave the approval to the resolution, but the judges considered that there were no grounds for urgency: hearing scheduled for 11 November, the day after the last date for the deed

Journalist

October 11 – 11.48am – MILAN

The path remains long and still full of potholes, but in the meantime the weeks leading up to the deed for the sale of the San Siro area to Milan and Inter should not hold any surprises. The Regional Administrative Court of Lombardy has in fact rejected the request to urgently suspend the effects of the resolution of the Municipality of Milan relating to the sale, a request made by the Gruppo Verde San Siro Association and by over one hundred inhabitants of the neighborhood who had notified additional reasons to the appeal already presented to prevent the demolition of the Meazza.

motivation

The court has set the hearing for November 11th, a non-coincidental date. It is the day after the Superintendency’s restriction on the second ring of the Meazza would come into force: if the stadium were still publicly owned, in fact, it could no longer be demolished. In this way, however, it is possible to get the deed done in good time, even if the deadlines are very tight. As is known, the demolition (except for a small portion) of the current facility is one of the essential conditions set by the two clubs to give life to the new project. “Contrary to what was deduced in the request for an urgent monocratic precautionary measure contained in the additional reasons, a prejudice of extreme gravity and urgency cannot be envisaged – we read in the reasoning of the TAR – such as not to allow us to wait for the examination of the precautionary request in a collegial hearing”. Furthermore, “from the imminent acquisition of effectiveness of the contested council resolution with the added reasons and from the possible stipulation of the purchase and sale contract – the judges continue -, no current prejudice can be configured with respect to the specific interests of which the appellants are bearers, who deduce that they are suffering damage from the urban building transformations and from the start of works which cannot be implemented immediately”.

request

The association’s request was to “suspend, as a matter of urgency, the effects of the resolution, so as to avoid the signing of a contract for the sale of the areas while awaiting the hearing”. The San Siro green group pointed the finger at “numerous additional reasons”, including “the violation of environmental regulations”.



ttn-14