8 IV, 3 LV, 4 RV, 4 ZDM, 4 ZM, 3 LA and RA and 7 MS What actually has in mind chelsea
Generate profits. At Broja, Gilchrist and George, the “cash-out” is pending, Veiga could still be sold, Guiu is awarded.
As regrettable as it is, but the system works. Almost all talents that have been obliged and sold again since the takeover have expected. This year alone, Madueke, Petrovic and Humphreys dropped around 45 million profits. Veiga will probably increase this sum by 15-20 million and then you need a second LV. Chilwell no longer plays a role.
Well, 1 billion transfer deficit in the past 5 years.
I also do not write about the entire transfers of the past 5 years, but of talents since the takeover.
Chelsea has sometimes done crazy things. But when Fernandez and Caicedo form the midfield duo for 10 years, the 240 million well -created money are invested. Fofana, Mudryk, Sterling and Koulibaly were actually the only big fails, although “only” 18 million loss was made in the latter.
Since the violent transfer offensive 2022, the minus has been flattening every year, this year you could go out with +/- 0 or even achieve a slight surplus. Jackson, Broja, Gilchrist, Veiga, George and Chukwuemeka and Dewsbury-Hall all have a market, especially in England.
150-200 million are possible, even if you don’t get any replacement for Nunku, Sterling, Fofana, Ugochukwu and Chilwell.
The point would then be reached where the talents refinance the “normal business”. If the money is missing next year, Santos or Gusto will be sold with great profit in doubt without losing regular forces.
The following year, Sarr, Delap, Penders and Paez could ring the till.
And so forth…
I am not quite convinced yet.
If you start the whole thing in a single season 22/23 with a transfer minus of almost 600 million, it should be clear that the minus will have to decrease at some point in the following season because you will sell some of these players again at some point. I still have great doubts that the whole thing is sustainable or even the “normal business” is refinanced. So far, Boehly has been with a minus of over 900 million.
But maybe Boehly has put on an effect like stock trading. By overheating the market through excessive purchases, you can sell all the talents all the more expensive afterwards. Then of course it could work.