The Public Prosecution Service has advised the resignation of both. For department procurer YS, because he failed to report that his son had prior knowledge from the entrance exam to the judicial internship and for his wife, judge in Ypres, because she too was aware, but remained on the sidelines. This is a criminal case that was passed on in advance by Advocate General CB, member of the Examination Board, to the son of the couple.
“Don’t give me the death penalty here,” YS asked the judge. “I have for thirty years of loyal service, have been introducing magistrates for years young, and want to complete my career in beauty.” He emphasized that he and his wife had not asked CB “It happened to us. He acted on his own initiative.”
The couple says it was not aware that it was the real case from the exam. According to them, their son also assumed that it was just an example.