Cornald Maas arouses an incredible amount of irritation among the people because he talks incredibly for his turn at the Eurovision Song Contest. “Can he not just keep his mouth?” It sounds angry.
The first semifinal of the Eurovision Song Contest, containing the flawless performance by Claude, is over. Cornald Maas was again the familiar commentator, but mainly aroused an incredible annoyance at the end of the broadcast. When the countries that are through, he was always too fast the presenters.
Muzzle
Cornald always called the name of the winning country for one second before the Swiss presenters did. Mega disturbing, the viewers think that, according to a tour on X.
One of the angry viewers is Monica. She says: “Can’t that Cornald Maas keep his mouth shut? That joy … Can we not hear the result from the presenter? I will look through a different channel this weekend; really highly annoying and it is again limp.”
Two seconds
Media journalist Jef Willemsen understands frustration. He says: “Cornald Maas lives in that commentary for 2 seconds in the future. Calling who is through for the presenters distracts quite a bit.”
Stefan is also pretty pissed off. “Cornald is ahead of a second and takes all the tension out of the show,” he says. “”Shut the f*ck up.“”
And Mr. Ed: “Blood irritant indeed!”
What does Cornald say?
Cornald himself feels very attacked. He reacts angry: “Maybe just an idea that you are delving into something? I can’t / could do anything about this – Delay in terms of technology. ”
One crypto on that: “You should have warned Hilversum after the first announcement, the other would have gone well if you yourself had left a two to three seconds extra break.”
Learning moment
So Jef totally agrees. “What Crypto says. It is not a personal attack either, you put in the heat of the moment Also just your work. Learning moment for Thursday and Saturday. Quite apart from the question of whether it is immediately necessary to repeat what you can see and hear for viewers. ”
Why does Cornald always talk through the presenters at all? He says: “I rarely speak through the presenters, but sometimes it has to be – with text and explanation about the way of voting for example …”