One of those buildings is the house in Nieuw-Vennep. The judge asks the suspects if they “knew that they should take fire on the mother of an international drug criminal.” “No, I was very shocked,” says Nouaman A. “I was asked the day before if I wanted to do a job for 7000 euros, I didn’t know anymore.”

Within an hour after their departure, they are arrested by the police, with the automatic firearm still in the trunk. Although Nouaman A. now, seven months later, confesses, Amir A. full that he was only called in as a driver, and also knew nothing about the weapon in the trunk.

The suspect was only free for two days

Because the testimony, camera images and method of arrest can be demonstrated according to the public prosecutor that the men knew what they were doing, she demands in prison against Amir A. 24 months, of which 8 is conditional. Nouaman A. heard 28 months of unconditional prison sentence against him.

The lawyers of both gentlemen hope for a considerably lower punishment, with the plea for Nouaman A. especially noticeable. At the time of arrest, he was only two days off from a German prison, where he had sat for a thud for two years. After years of out -of -home placements and convictions, it would now have penetrated that something should change.

There would now be room for him at a special program with people trusted for him, away from Amsterdam-Oost, where he grew up. His lawyer therefore hopes that he would have to be in jail for another month, so that he can start that program as soon as possible.

ttn-55