The birch erroids changed to the battle for the dominance of the Turku Duplex Villa Property real estate. On Wednesday, the situation escalated to remove Helena Koivu from the farm.
Former hockey player Mikko Koivu and his ex-spouse Helena birch The post -divorce real estate dispute from the Turku Kakirah villa escalated on Wednesday to a situation where police were looking for Helena Koivu’s site. First told about the matter Seiska.
Helena claimed Wednesday that she couldn’t get inside an apartment where she had lived for a while. Helena said the locks had been replaced, so she called the police. However, the police took him away. The exact reason for this is not known.
“I want to say clearly: I haven’t done anything wrong,” Helena Koivu said in the Stories section of her Instagram account. The stories can be seen for 24 hours of their release.
It is known that Helena has not agreed to leave Tilus voluntarily. Iltalehti did not reach Helena to comment on what happened.
The property dispute escalated
The difference between birches was found legally dismantled in the Minnesota court in January 2024. However, it did not silence disagreement. Over the years, the division of property related to birch divorce has been investigated in various courts in both Finland and the United States.
Recently, the ex-couple has contributed to the ownership of the two-time real estate. The maritime residential area is home to a couple of married villas. The two -time properties include the main building and the guesthouse.
Helena has shared videos of ex-couple clashes on social media and has accused Mikko for bullying.
In January, the District Court of Southwest Finland was confirmed to Iltalehti at the end of December, where Helena Koivu is accused of three crimes. He is charged with theft, secretiveness and violation of the home peace. The lawyers are Mikko Koivu and his current wife Natalie birch.
Events that Helena Koivu are accused of will be in the spring and around the last Midsummer. These criminal charges are to be dealt with in court later.
In February, Helena Koivu’s restraining order application against the caretaker hired by ex-spouse Mikko Koivu was dismissed in the District Court of Southwest Finland. The trial showed numerous video evidence of clashes and discussions between Helena and the caretaker. Helena had filmed most of the videos herself. There was also a surveillance camera photo.
– Apparently I can be disturbed in this way, Koivu comments to Iltalehti after the court ruling.
At the beginning of March, Helena Koivu made a surprise decision and canceled her ex-margin Mikko Koivu and her new wife Natalie Koivu. The application was to be processed on March 5 in the District Court of Southwest Finland.
– For me, the well -being of my children is more important than quarreling in court, and I want to focus on reconciliation negotiations so that we can proceed in the situation and offer our children the most balanced everyday, Koivu explained in his application for withdrawal.
Mikko Koivu broke the silence
Mikko Koivu stayed silent for a long time. However, he opened his wordy coffin for Iltalehti in November last year. Mikko Koivu said that when Helena Koivu moved to Finland, Mikko first offered her a block of flats she owned from the center of Turku.
However, Helena settled the house in the Duplex Villa, more specifically in her guest house.
– When we built a villa, Helena owned half of the country. After the legal proceedings, Helena owed me the debt because she had finally received more money than she was legally entitled, Koivu said.
– Then we agreed that I would not inherit his debts, but to transfer his plot of ownership of the plot to me. He agreed to this.
The transfer of the land ownership of the site can be found in, for example, parenting assessment and Minnesota’s court records.
However, Helena did not sign the papers to get the ownership of the lawsuit. Therefore, he has also been issued in Minnesota. Helena has complained about the matter in Minnesota for different courts. Helena’s last appeal went to the Supreme Court, but in January the Minnesota Supreme Court dismissed the appeal.
In an interview with Iltalehti, Mikko Koivu talked about a difficult situation with his ex-wife Helena. Pasi Liesimaa
Turn
The ownership dispute of the two -time property had already been officially completed when the property register was updated in February that the property was owned by Mikko Koivu solely.
Helena did not become inactive. Iltalehti’s District Court documents received by Iltalehti revealed that on 12 March, Helena filed a complaint about the Land Survey of the Land Survey of Finland, according to which Mikko would fully own properties in Turku’s twice.
According to Helena, the decision did not take into account the need for an execculation procedure for the enforcement of foreign judgment in Finland. Helena demanded that the lawsuit be annulled. The National Land Survey of Finland granted On the seventhat they have made a mistake.
– I have discussed this with the expert who made the solution. This is a human mistake, the officer admitted to the magazine.
According to the lawsuit dated 31 January 31, Helena owned half of the property, but according to Iltalehti’s Leaf Information on February 10, the property is owned solely by Mikko.
Mikko: “Twice did not interest Helena”
Mikko Koivu told me In Ilta-Sanomatthat in the District Court of Southwest Finland, Mikko Koivu’s requirement will be discussed in April to restore his two-time property management to him.
Birch told the magazine that Helena Koivu did not express interest in the villa while they were married. According to Mikko, Helena did not have any requirements for two times when the matter was previously dealt with in the Minnesota court.
Birch told IS that he couldn’t spend time with his own villa. Helena has published videos on social media that follow Mikko and her current spouse Natalie.
– It’s my villa, of course I could go there. However, I want to protect my children. Helena organizes an incident every time we go to the cottage and follows us, Mikko said.
At that time, Mikko did not know when the final solution would be. However, he believed it would come, and then Helena had to look for a new home for himself.