Bridget Maasland has a strong suspicion that Jan Slagter is going to rage so much against Frederieke Leeflang because this NPO chief is a female person. “He doesn’t do this for men.”
It takes some getting used to: Jan Slagter, the boss of the shelter for pathetic TV embankments, does rage against someone who is accused of cross-border behavior in the public broadcaster. NPO chief Frederieke Leeflang has to be on non-active, he thinks. All those anonymous accusations? That doesn’t matter anymore.
Bridget Critical
TV authority Tina Nijkamp finds it suspicious. “Remarkable about Jan Slagter’s reaction is that he has a very different vision than when the men were discredited. He defended it to the bone and now it is from: “Frederieke Leeflang has to get on!” It is of course measuring with two sizes, “she says in RTL Boulevard.
Bridget Maasland agrees: “Yes, Rob, Tina Nijkamp said the net too: Jan Slagter is a lot less mild about Frederieke Leeflang and about how she behaves within the NPO than when the men there showed cross -border behavior. What do you think of Jan’s fierce criticism? “
Coincidental
TV connoisseur Rob Goossens is a little more nuanced in it. “Well, he received fierce criticism of that at the time, so I would almost say that he learned from the criticism at the time and now pulls the line.”
Bridget: “And that would just happen to be with a woman. You think so. “
Rob: “It is striking, but where is he wrong in terms of content? She is the highest boss of the NPO, a report has been published in recent years that has not been done at all so far, yes … if it turns out that the highest boss would also misbehave, of course that must be investigated well become.”
Anonymous sources
Bridget does not consistently find Jan. “Of course, but of course that was also the case with the men.”
Colleague Luuk Ikink: “Yes, and he always said,” Anonymous sources, anonymous reports, that never tells me that much. ” He always said that. That is of course also true here in this case! We don’t really know at all what she did or did not do as a manager and whether it was so bad. ”
Nap
Rob also finds it strange that Jan suddenly embraces all those anonymous sources. “What does not help is that he was at Renze, in which he then tells a tasty, painful anecdote about how she would have commented on one of her fellow drivers as a” drizzly man. “
“Yes, that is also an anonymous anecdote and that is precisely what he has a brother to death. So I would say: if he himself has such a big problem with it, pull that line on and keep yourself on it. ”
What does Hannah say?
Writer Hannah Prins shows a similar sound. She says in the talk show Van Roosmalen & Groenteman: “What I don’t understand: I once sat at 1 with Jan Slagter and then he went to the breach to defend Matthijs. Then I was again and then it was about Tom Egbers and I think Jan was also defending Tom. Al “
“In men are only defended, even though there are already reports about what they have done. And as soon as there is only one thing about a woman in a powerful position … then Jan comes and suddenly says, “Yes, this and this!”