For some time now, on social networks and public statements, Juan Grabois criticized the court decision that Cristina Kirchner wear an electronic anklet, have visits conditioned and your visits to the balcony are limited; pointing out as “cruelty” towards his figure. In the streaming cycle Duka Citizenled by Andrés “Duka” Ducatenzeiler the social leader stated: “Cristina is like Jesus, because they also put an anklet on Jesus and that brings her closer to him.”
Beyond the unusual comparison between the former Peronist president and Jesus Christ made in the program of the former president of the Club Atlético Independiente, Grabois has been maintaining in television statements that his position regarding Cristina Kirchner’s judicial situation goes beyond strict legality and enters into the symbolic. A narrative that is limited to the hypothesis that there is a judicial coup against the Justicialist leader through lawfare maneuvers.
The Road Traffic case ended with a six-year prison sentence of Cristina Kirchner, maintaining a detention home from mid-2025, by fraudulent administration in public works in the province of Santa Cruz. In addition to the restriction, perpetual disqualification from holding public office was imposed. House arrest was imposed by the Federal Criminal Oral Court No. 2, which took into account his age — over 70 years old — and an attempted homicide suffered in 2022.
Prosecutors in the case have reacted to these measures by stating that the domiciliary is a privilege compared to what would correspond to the same sentence under normal conditions of penitentiary complianceand have even asked that she be sent to a regular prison and that house arrest decisions be annulled. An aspect that was not considered until now by the magistrates and that the former president’s defense flatly rejects.
“We request that house arrest be carried out without the placement of an electronic anklet,” they said. Carlos Alberto Beraldi and Ary Rubén Llernovoy, lawyers defending the Justicialist leader at the time the detention measure was implemented.
This request was submitted directly to the Federal Oral Court 2the same court that had convicted Fernández de Kirchner.
Although the court and then higher authorities They rejected that request. and maintained the mandatory use of the electronic anklet (as confirmed by a decision of the Federal Court of Cassation in February 2026), the lawyers’ presentation was formally recorded in the case and was reported by various media
Image gallery
