The controversy grew from the last gestures of the United States to Argentina. First, before the trip to New York, it was the announcement of zero withholdings for the field liquidates its dollars at a more convenient price. And now the negotiation was added in New York, where the American treasure advances with a loan to cover maturities for almost 28 billion dollars and reinforce reservations. Both movements aim to give oxygen to the government in full campaign, although criticisms for their political and economic cost also revived.
The combination of these movements was celebrated as a success by the ruling party, but at the same time opened a debate about its consequences. In networks, opponents and analysts compare it with short -term maneuvers aimed at sustaining the economy to the elections, just as it happened with Massa in 2023 when the term “Platita Plan” was popularized.
One of the journalists who talked most about the subject was Ernesto Tenembaum in his program “El Piripipi” by radio with you. There he analyzed that the photo with Trump hides a critical situation: “If you spend it as a fuck as Milei says, giving dollars for people to vote for you and love you or to be well in the surveys or to anchor inflation, at one time the dollars begin to miss. Then you go out to ask for debt desperately. And this is a moment of despair of the government.”
He also questioned the use of fiscal reserves and resources in this scheme. “It is an atrocious immorality, that we are giving away dollars of the reserves so that Milei does not explode. We are giving away tax resources so that the liquidal field dollars in the context of an electoral campaign.” And he concluded with a strong phrase: “There has been no ‘Plan Plan’ like the one we are living at this time.”
Tenembaum reference connects with the immediate antecedent. In 2023, Massa had been the target of the same criticism when the term “talk plan” was used from the opposition to indicate economic bonds and measures for electoral purposes. Today, the term returns to describe Milei’s decisions: before they were pesos distributed in the campaign, they are now external agreements, winks to the field and indebtedness in dollars.
