The Supreme Court will decide on December 13 whether to ratify the five years in prison or repeat the trial
Next December 13 is the date on which the Supreme Court (TS) will resolve the appeal against the sentence that imposes five years in prison on Luis Eduardo RI, ex-husband of Monica Oltra, for the continued abuse of a minor under guardianship in the Valencia juvenile center where he worked as an educator. It is the last bullet that the convicted person has to avoid the punishment of a case of abuse that led to a more complex case that cost the then vice president of the Consell and head of the Department of Inclusive Policies her job.
The High Court must decide whether to finally ratify the aforementioned sentence of the Provincial Court of Valencia, confirmed at the time by the Superior Court of Justice, or even if it upholds the appeal presented by the defense of Luis Eduardo RI, which requests that the trial be repeated with full guarantees, including that the victim testify again, a circumstance that did not occur in the previous partial repetition of the oral hearing . As confirmed by Supreme Court sources Lift-EMV, of the Prensa Ibérica group, the deliberation of the appeal on December 13 will be held without hearing for the parties. And the court will be made up of Juan Ramón Berdugo (president), Ana Ferrer (speaker), Pablo Llarena, Vicente Magro and Angel Luis Hurtado.
The events, declared proven by the Provincial Court and confirmed by the TSJCV, occurred between 2016 and 2017, when the social educator worked the night shift at a center for minors. Valencia. The ex-husband of the person responsible for Inclusive Policies went to the minor’s room when the teenager was being punished.
The man sentenced to five years in prison, who admitted that yes He entered the room and was alone with the girl.he took the opportunity to massage her neck and back area and, once he thought she was asleep, he took the girl’s hand and masturbated, according to proven facts pending a final ruling.
The Supreme Court will determine on December 13 whether to ratify the ruling or consider that the partial repetition of the trial, which included some reports that supported the defense thesis, was insufficient and the trial would have to be completely repeated. , as his defense requests.