The Iran conflict provides a rare practical test for the thesis of Bitcoin as a safe haven. What speaks for and against.

• Bitcoin shows partly crisis-resistant price behavior
• ETF outflows and strategy selling weigh on sentiment
• Analysts remain divided about the further course of the share price

Significant price fluctuations are more the rule than the exception on the crypto market. Nevertheless, the discussion about whether the original cryptocurrency Bitcoin, in particular, can be valued as a “safe haven” regardless of its volatility in times of geopolitical crises, high inflation or the collapse of banks, continues to shape the history of the crypto veteran. This thesis is currently being put to the test – with a view to the currently largest geopolitical source of conflict: the war in Iran.

However, the question of whether Bitcoin fulfills this function as a digital refuge in reality cannot be answered clearly with the raw data from the ongoing Iran conflict. The all-time high of around $126,000, which the cryptocurrency marked in October 2025, is now far behind. In addition, the latest downward trend began before the hot phase of the conflict: In February 2026, a toxic combination of persistent global inflation concerns and the threat of Iranian escalation pushed the Bitcoin price to an annual low of around $60,000. However, what has happened on trading venues since then provides fodder for both sides of the debate.

Which speaks for Bitcoin as a safe haven

The strongest argument is the relative performance of the weeks after the start of the war on February 28th. After an initial sell-off to below $63,000, Bitcoin recovered quickly and climbed to around $80,000 by the end of April, an increase of around 20 percent from the wartime low. Over the same period, gold lost around 15 percent from its annual high in January 2026 as the energy shock caused by rising oil prices drove up inflation expectations and bond yields. Gold, as a non-interest-bearing asset, structurally suffers from higher returns as opportunity cost pressures grow. Bitcoin, on the other hand, whose investment thesis is based on a tightly limited supply of 21 million units, benefited from the very dynamics that hurt the precious metal.

The changed market structure also contributed to the relative strength of the cryptocurrency. When the attacks began on a Saturday, Bitcoin was the only major liquid market open, pricing in the shock in real time while stock and gold markets were still closed. The initial price pattern, first sell-off, then buy-back at the low, is typical of institutional long-term positioning, not short-term speculation, according to a Cash Online analysis from May 2026. This finding is supported by capital flows: Bitcoin ETFs gained more than five billion dollars net between March and early May after initial outflows, while gold ETFs lost eleven billion dollars in the first half of March alone.

Which speaks against the thesis

The immediate price trend at the sharpest escalation point tells a different story. When the US government announced further attacks on April 2nd and the price of oil rose to over $106 a barrel, Bitcoin fell to $65,834 within a few hours. Anyone who needed liquidity at that moment received it at significantly lower rates than before, which directly contradicts the core promise of a safe haven.

The clearest evidence to the contrary so far comes from developments around June 2, 2026. Strategy, the world’s largest listed Bitcoin holder and a long-standing symbol of the uncompromising holding strategy, sold Bitcoin again for the first time since December 2022, according to an SEC report from June 1, 2022: 32 units at an average price of $77,135, with proceeds of $2.5 million to finance dividend payments on preferred shares. Mathematically, this corresponds to 0.004 percent of the total holdings of over 843,000 BTC, but the market reaction was still violent. Bitcoin broke the psychologically important $70,000 mark within hours and slipped to its lowest level since mid-April, down around six percent in one trading day. The news hit not because of its magnitude, but because it broke the “never sell” narrative around Strategy that had been in place for years and hit an already heavily stressed market.

This market was already under pressure, as starting May 7, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded 11 consecutive trading days of net outflows, the longest streak since these products launched in January 2024 – totaling over $4 billion by the end of May and another $483 million on June 1 alone. At the same time, Mt. Gox moved around 10,400 BTC worth almost $740 million to previously unknown wallets at the beginning of June. While on-chain data did not show direct exchange deposits, with summer liquidity already thin, the news was enough to further increase nervousness. And another stressful factor arose: In April, US authorities said they froze between $344 and $500 million in cryptocurrencies that were connected to Iranian state operations, thereby sparking a fundamental debate about the actual remoteness of Bitcoin from the state in a geopolitical emergency.

Big banks are rowing back: where will BTC stand at the end of the year?

The analyst range for the end of 2026 has recently shifted significantly and shows how divided the market is about the future direction. Standard Chartered has lowered its year-end target twice: from the original $300,000 in December 2025, first to $150,000, then further to $100,000 in February 2026, with the explicit note that a drop back to $50,000 before a possible recovery is not out of the question. Analyst Geoff Kendrick cites ongoing ETF outflows and the US Federal Reserve’s unwillingness to quickly cut interest rates as reasons. Bernstein, on the other hand, is holding on to $150,000 and sees ETF-driven inflows as a key catalyst. Citi explicitly ties its price target of $143,000 to the passage of the CLARITY Act and expects $15 billion in new ETF inflows if signed. Market commentator Aralez, meanwhile, on

Against this background, the most precise picture remains a hybrid one: Bitcoin neither behaved as a classic safe haven in the Iran conflict nor did it crash as a pure risk asset. The price slide at the beginning of June shows how vulnerable the asset remains to sentiment shocks, even if the material cause is minimal. The ETF flow data in the coming weeks will show whether this becomes a deeper correction or a short-term exaggeration.

Claudia Stephan, editorial team at finanzen.net



This text is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an investment recommendation. finanzen.net GmbH excludes any claims for recourse.


By the way: Strategy (ex MicroStrategy) and other US stocks can even be traded on finanzen.net ZERO until 11 p.m. (without order fees, plus spreads). Open a depot now for free and secure a new customer bonus!

Selected leverage products on Strategy (ex MicroStrategy)

With knock-outs, speculative investors can participate disproportionately in price movements. Simply select the desired leverage and we will show you suitable open-end products on Strategy (ex MicroStrategy)

Risk warning: Suffer on average 7 out of 10 retail investors Losses when trading with turbo certificates. Turbo certificates are high-risk products and not suitable for long-term investment strategies.

Advertising



ttn-28