Peps magic is over.
Then get a 75 million striker from Frankfurt although there is no need (Haaland) and let it play on the 10, which he cannot do at all.
But there was already the need as a back-up from Haaland and not with him in the field.
I’ve always been a big PEP critic because he is not a good coach for me. A good trainer makes what he has more than expected. Short examples: Klopp in Mainz and Dortmund, Tuchel in Mainz and Dortmund, Streich in Freiburg, Schmidt in Heidenheim or to go internationally Ferguson in Aberdeen and Manchester, Ranieri in Leicester and the best coach for me, King Otto Rehhagel ever existed in Kaiserslautern and Greece. Well back to Pep. Peps career is not particularly successful if you are careful.
He had the absolute Prime Barcelona among himself and was able to throw money with money and thus got a relatively logical 3 championships 2 cup victory and 2 cl win.
After that at Bavaria when he was also able to throw money in relation to the national competition as he wanted with money in 3 years for 3 championships and 2 cup wins. At that time, almost every average coach would have achieved that with the squad.
And since then City. The same constellation he can throw around with money and now has 6 championships 2 cup wins and 1 cl title in 8 years. Incidentally, I deliberately leave unimportant titles such as supercups and club worlds!
Of course, a certain tactical concept is part of it, I don’t want to deny Guardiola at all. There have been enough coaches to copy their style of play. My point is, however, if you put a Guardiola into a midfield team where he also has to house holding with finances and “the big ones” would not bought the best players every season after 2 or 3 years no rooster to Guardiola because he disappears in insignificance would. Would a Guardiola with Nottingham currently also stand in third place? Pep is not stupid who knows that what I am writing here (without knowing myself logically) so he has extended his contract again. He also observes world football and knows he can’t go to City anywhere. Italy falls out completely that no longer have any coal. In Spain there were only a return to Barca who have brought “degrees” with a flick a new coach where it is running and who is not gone again in summer. Only FC Bayern goes back to the Bundesliga who have a similar situation with Kompany. It cannot change within England because nobody has spent more coal than City. If Paris would remain, but after the departure of Neymar, Messi and Mbappe on more or less austerity course, there are nothing with fabs. He doesn’t go to the Saudis because he knows that he would destroy his reputation so only a national team. Realistically, because of the player pool, only Spain and France can be considered. De la Fuente has a contract until 2028 and Dechamps until after the 2026 World Cup, so the items are both blocked at least until then.
My estimate is when France wants him after the tournament he stops at City. If not fulfills his contract, a Sabat year does a sabat year and takes over after the European Championship 2028 Spain (of course the association also wants that).
Okay again enough about Guardiola, sorry …
It’s a shame that contributions cannot be marked as illegally worthwhile, because I really want the time that I put into this 0/10 opinion. You hardly notice that there seems to be a personal difference between you and pep that more than dazzles your perception. Declaring PEP as an average trainer and saying “Yes Cl actually really easy if you have enough money” is just cheeky. How much CL does PSG have again? Or manu has been gone since Ferguson? How much money was invested?
Simply a bit weird.
I find the basic idea of the contribution correct. Namely, that Guardiola has never proven that he is able to adapt his tactical concept to the existing player material. The player material was always adapted to its tactical concept, even with Bavaria where coaches are actually said that they should work accordingly with the existing player material and the club philosophy. Nevertheless, Thiago and Alonso came two players who needed / wanted PEP for his system.
However, the conclusion according to the motto “Guardiola is a bad coach” and “through the squads his CLS are worth nothing” of course, Guardiola is probably the tactically of the best coach of all time, but the tactics alone does not make the best overall Trainer, but also to be able to adapt his playing style of a team and thus be successful (e.g. Mourinho played football with postage and interfen, but also let Real play aggressively).
Guardiola is too concept -oriented for this. Why should he let a football play from which he is not convinced? Of course, he gets the players he feels for fitting.
Why should you interpret it negatively and demand that he should do it the other way around to prove himself? That makes no sense.
Actually, you have to praise Guardiola’s concept football even more. Its impact on football in general is enormous.
Not many can keep up.
And that the best trainers work with the best players is first very likely and secondly also completely logical.
The only thing Guardiola is in the way is himself. Has been in the past in important games. In addition, he is more and more off his energy. But that’s human.
Mourinho also had his gamz special football. The defensive was always the focus. The overall picture is too high that there was a successful national season at Real.
To what extent was his term at Real, for example, more special than Guardiolas near Bavaria?
Take a look at the squad. Real was already a CL-ready at the time, but that’s exactly what he couldn’t do.
That only needed a real genius as a trainer.
Sorry for off-topic
As I said, I also think that Guardiola is also a very good coach in overall view. And as I said, the best of all time for me.
However, it is a difference for me whether you are a squad that is tailored to your requirements 1: 1, as he has shaped his own philosophy at Barca, and at City Had millions or whether you do it with a squad that is not perfectly tailored to your requirements. He had the latter at Bayern, the only station with which he could not win the CL.
And I can find that negative that he must have adapted his squad to his needs so that he can be successful.
On the other hand, PEP has to be interpreted positively that he is able to precisely formulate the players’ profiles.
And to Mou: Real may have been Cl Reif at the time, but you just narrowly failed because of a very strong FCB at that time. In penalty shooting to be precise. And in this a trainer can do little but to give the penalty to players such as CR7, Alonso and Kaka. In return, he definitely did not get the title with a CL mature postage.