If Bruges really makes you serious, then of course he will want to change. I would also treat him, but I am skeptical whether he will prevail so quickly in a new environment. The last few weeks has been really strong, but before that it was really underground. Actually, he recently had his best phase in 2.5 years.
3 million with 1 year remaining contract don’t sound that bad either.
I honestly see differently. He always had to struggle with injuries and didn’t really find his rhythm, but I wouldn’t speak of underground. In my view, it was not really used according to his strengths. This only changed Polzin and immediately delivered rice. For me, his talent would hardly be replaced with € 3 million. I would definitely open the bill here whether it would no longer be worthwhile to do without a transfer and to increase the likelihood of a Bundesliga slide.
I go with me, go Risko or possibly go to 3 million with resort (25-30%) 👍️
Basically, the 1st and 2nd Bundesliga sells far too cheap abroad, because you can still learn a lot from the Portuguese / Dutch! 🤑
Did you take a look at the statistics or just hit it by feeling?
I advise you to look at the transfers of the respective leagues.
Hi
What statistics support your claim (that it is not the case if I can interpret it like this)?
Exceptions (e.g. Frankfurt) confirm the rule, but it tends to be the case
This is really cool, you get out of an assertion that is simply wrong and because you don’t feel like looking after I should be in the obligation to prove
Fortunately, the site has good statistics:
Portugal:
https://www.transfermarkt.de/liga-nos/transferkorde/wettbewertb/po1
Netherlands:
https://www.transfermarkt.de/eredivisie/transferkorde/wettbewertb/nl1
Bundesliga:
https://www.transfermarkt.de/bundesliga/transferkorde/wettbewertb/l1
The Bundesliga is partly to be located clearly in front of the other two leagues both from the amount of more expensive transfers and a single volume.
Important, filtering to only exits, because the link is not working.
Thank you first. But still, why should my claim be wrong? 🙃
If you had written a sentence, why would everything be good, but only to say “is wrong and looking statistics” is not exactly a well -founded argument right?
I think you did not understand my claim that the other two leagues get out more with players (sometimes significantly above market value), which is unfortunately not visible from your statistics, but you would have to look at the individual players.
Your statistics show only absolute numbers, but the magical number is the difference between MW and the actual sales price
Examples:
Bernardo Silva ::: MW at Benfica = 3.5 million ::: Sells to Monaco for 15.75 million.
Joao Felix ::: MW at Benfica = 70 million ::: Sell on Atletico for 127 million.
Leao ::: MW at Sporting = 6 million ::: Sales to Losc for 20 million.
But even with absolute No Names / One Hit Wonders, the Portuguese clubs make it excellent:
Fábio Silva ::: MW at Porto = 12 million ::: sells to Wolverhampton for 40 million.
Gonçalo Guedes ::: MW at Benfica = 9 million ::: Sales to PSG for 30 million.
Francisco Trincão ::: MW at Braga = 16 million ::: Sell to Barca for 32 million.
Qed 😉
Nice evening
The list of you is somehow nonsensical.
1st time the market values here on TM are a gimmick of users. These do not automatically reflect the real market. So even if a player is listed here with 30 million, it does not automatically mean that he was sold below the market value for a change for 25 million. This can also simply mean that the MW assessment here was simply wrong.
2. If you do not go to the contract lengths at the change you mentioned. For example, Tricao had 3 years of contract during his change, which is a completely different situation than with a player like Reis who will be free in 12 months. At Leao you cling to the fact that Sporting initially did not get anything and the money flowed after a long legal dispute.
3. The players who call you names are all changed from the 3 large clubs apart from Trincao and even Trincao played the number 4 in the country.
Comparing to the HSV simply makes no sense because these clubs (especially the large 3) have completely different requirements.
If you want to make comparisons to the HSV, you should rather look at teams like Boavista, CD Nacional or Gil Vicente.
4. Can you make such subjective compilations for each league:
Gvardiol: Retrosphere 90 million, MW 75 million; Kolo Muani: Retrosphere 95 million, MW 80 million; Marmoush replacement 75 million, MW 60 million; Pulisic: Retrosphere 64 million, MW 60 million (by the way in one year of the remaining contract).
I could continue this list. But to show what I mean, hopefully it is enough: a self -selected selection of transfers gives no information about whether clubs in a league are better off selling than that of another league.