Mikko Silvennoinen of the Eurovision Song Contest and Wise Wise Man was embarrassed by the voting behavior of professional juries this year.
Mikko Silvennoinen wonders about the voting behavior of professional jury in this year’s visa. Atte Kajova
Austrian JJ Won the Eurovision Song Contest in the Saturday night finals.
Prior to the visa final, Swedish representative Kaj was at the forefront of betting statistics throughout the spring and Finland Erika Vikman too We were pushing for the tip. The Eurovision Song Contest has been explained Mikko Silvennoinen Not disappointed in the investment of Finnish performances.
Kaj became fourth, and Erika ranked eleven.
– I think the eleventh place is the fourth best investment ever. I think it’s really well, he praises Erika Vikman.
– I understand that when we are willing to profit and annoy that it may be possible to win, the eleventh place may seem like a disappointment. But that’s not it!
He considers Kaj’s investment good, but undeniably surprising, because the trio was a pre -favorite during the spring.
-I always quote in these situations Krista Siegfrids Saying that Eurovision is like throwing a dart. That’s what this game is. It is really hard to predict what works for me in the year and what is the overall setting, he analyzes.
He himself considered Austria’s performance as the best bet of the Eurovision Song Contest. Silvennoinen also explains his support by the fact that JJ had Finnish professional expertise with his background.
JJ’s outfit was a fashion designer Teemu Muurimäki handwriting and Ari Levelä was responsible for the visual appearance of the Austrian performance.
Silvennoinen also highlights the professional jury, which this year confused.
– Especially yesterday, this professional voting behavior was quite random. I think I would update it out loud when it was, he laughs.
– It is strange that a music professional can disagree with what is good. But maybe it tells us that the truth is in the eye of the beholder and no one is wrong.
According to him, the public points made more sense than the points given by the professional jury.
However, according to him, the system needs a change.
-Perhaps the Eurovision Song Contest should take this UMK model, where the professional jury emphasizes 25 % and not 50 %. It is a good model and respects the audience. Personally, I did not understand the behavior of the jury yesterday at all, he updates.