Kompany was a great player who I always liked a lot. In addition, he was a leading player who is believed to have a good path as a coach. It must also be due to his reputation as a player that he is associated with other clubs. Because the performance at Anderlecht was sometimes catastrophic. The fact that he was allowed to stay for so long can only be explained by his status.
I agree. From the pure coaching performance he had no success at Anderlecht. I also found the rumor about BMG very strange, because I couldn’t understand this conclusion. But there are now some former coaches who are/are coming onto the market. All with varying degrees of success.
Third place doesn’t sound so bad for Anderlecht? How do you come to the verdict (have Belgian football zero point zero on the screen)?
I’m curious about that too. Complete nonsense such a conclusion. Kompany did a good job considering the overall circumstances. There’s something being thrown out again without rhyme or reason.
But your post also says a lot and also with a lot of sense and understanding. But I’m happy to explain my position to you.
Kompany has been a coach in Anderlecht since 2020. He was hired by City as a player-coach and initially had no license after the takeover. He got his “qualification” as a legend.
In his entire time he has not initiated any sustainable development. Yes, he finished third, but that’s to be expected with a team like Anderlecht. Its success was mostly based on the individual quality of its players, which is superior to most teams. Tactically, I never saw any real concept when I looked at them. And hence my doubt that he would really be suitable for a club like BMG in a league superior to the Belgian league.
what do you expect Quite presumptuous if one expects a “factual” answer to the postings made. Anyone who writes something so rash must therefore expect a reaction. Point.
The fact that Kompany doesn’t have a license is who’s problem? From Kompany? Did he run to Anderlecht and curry favor there? no He was asked and wanted to help. Now harping on about a license is adventurous and yet has absolutely nothing to do with the matter, that is, the work that you are criticizing. The license was copied. Where is the problem?
Kompany did a really good job. Of course there were also lows, totally logical, but overall it was really good and he pushed the club forward. There was nothing bad or catastrophic about it at all. That’s just nonsense and something like that shows me that it wasn’t really dealt with at all. Kompany was partly responsible for the fact that the club is halfway resurrected. He chose a path with extremely young players and followed it consistently. Every season he had to start from scratch because there was no money at all to build up. How can you not consider that in any way?
If we take away the most important players from a Klopp or Guardiola every year, not much remains of their glory. How do you want to build something there? Last year for the ConL. qualified, this year again for the European. competitions. Given the overall circumstances, he performed very, very well. Cup final incl.
What can Kompany do for the economic situation? Nothing at all. Important players are gone year after year, no replacement or too late, what do you expect but at the same time deploying and developing young talents. Kompany has achieved a great deal of good.
That you write that the success was only due to the individual class is not correct at all. With a few exceptions, the Belgian league is quite balanced and almost anyone can beat anyone. Clubs like Antwerp and Genk are in some cases even a bit better positioned individually than Anderlecht and ended up behind them.
What does no concept mean? There were enough games, especially against Bruges, where Anderlecht dominated the club at times or played on an equal footing, where wasn’t there a plan? Kompany had a very clear concept. But after a certain time he withdrew from this because he didn’t have the player material at his disposal. Give a Guardiola 11 Aubemeyangs (a good player of course) and then let him play his possession football. It’s gonna suck. Guaranteed. Kompany has adapted to the situation and made the most of it. So I seriously ask myself, what did you expect? It’s completely absurd.
Seriously, you don’t really know the league. If the people who are supposedly watching the league (and there are probably hundreds of them here in the daily assessments) and have so much idea, yes, then I ask myself why I’ve been the sole entertainer in the forum for years …. there reads except for 2 users who rarely write, not a single one.
And always that stuff from coaches in the minor leagues…sorry I can’t read it anymore. You were allowed to listen to the same crap from Clement…and now? There was some nonsense going on there. Or Blessin, he couldn’t be anything either, but he did a very good job despite being relegated with Genoa. It was exactly the same there….. “he comes from a small league, that can’t be anything”. It sounded similar here on this page. Can be read accordingly.
Hütter, Glasner, Seoane also came from smaller leagues, sometimes worse than the Belgian league and have almost predominantly celebrated successes and done a good job in the Bundesliga. Are these all coincidences? Of course a coach can fail, but that has relatively little to do with the league.