Exclusive Student Offer

Prime for Young Adults

Get a 6-month trial with premium college perks & fast delivery.

Start Free Trial
Listen Anywhere

Audible Standard Trial

Get 30 days of audiobooks free. Cancel anytime, keep your books.

Claim Free Books

The journalist and host Julia Mengolini was at the center of a new controversy on social networks after the dissemination of a video in which, during his program, he made a historical comparison between the social crisis prior to the French Revolution and the current economic situation in Argentina. In this context, he mentions the Minister of Economy Luis “Toto” Caputo and symbolically alludes to the guillotinewhich generated a strong political debate.

The fragment corresponds to a moment in his program in which Mengolini develops a analogy with Marie Antoinettethe French queen executed during the revolution. In the video—edited with a filter that distorts the voice to make it sound like a squirrel, probably with humorous intent—the journalist reflects on the elites’ reaction to situations of extreme poverty.

During his speech, Mengolini takes up the well-known phrase attributed to the French monarch, “If they don’t have bread, let them eat cake.”used historically to illustrate the disconnection between the ruling classes and popular suffering. From this reference, he proposes that when a society faces high levels of poverty and hungerhistory shows that extreme reactions can arise.

In this context, the driver mentions Caputo and suggests that statements or decisions made “with other people’s money” can generate growing social unrest. The comparison with the figure of Marie Antoinette derives in a symbolic reference to the guillotinealluding to the political consequences that deep crises have had in history.

The video is quickly went viral on social networkswhere it was interpreted in contrasting ways. Some users considered it a historical and satirical metaphor about social tension in contexts of economic crisis, while others questioned it because they understood that it was about an insinuation to violence against a government official.

The episode joins a series of increasingly harsh discursive intersections in the Argentine public debate, where historical analogies, irony and extreme references tend to rapidly amplify in the digital ecosystem.

Image gallery


In this note

ttn-25

Get Audible 30-Day Free Trial

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.