Jesse Mark is now commenting on the suspicion of crime himself.
Jesse Mark’s comment on this on Instagram. Pasi Liesimaa
In October last year, it was reported that a musician Jesse Markin suspected of gross assault of the child.
The assault is suspected of having occurred in August -September and the victim would be Markin’s own baby.
Iltalehti reached the case of the investigation director Tuomas Lindholm earlier today.
– It is suspected of injuries that there would be more artificial times. After all, it cannot be said, so it has had to be put in a reasonable extent, Lindholm Said earlier today to Iltalehti.
Mark is now commenting on the police himself.
– The police go out of the reckless in public, and at the same time the district court orders that I cannot talk about it under the threat of punishment. This is how the disappearance is protected by the victims, Markin writes in his Instagram stories.
“I have experts from all over the world who tell a different story when these heads,” he writes.
Markin says he has a lot of evidence. He writes in his publication that experts wanted to be in HUS, but HUS refused.
– Does this show that the child’s health is the number one priority and not protecting one’s own ass? They have now changed their opinion on symptoms three times without justification. How can the opinion change if the facts are known once, Mark asks.
Markin says in his publication that he has statements from doctors, radiologists and other experts.
– And these snakes here invented fairy tales so they don’t look quite incompetent.
In October, Markin told how the baby began to occur shortly after birth.
– To our surprise, doctors reported that the situation suggests that we may have reason to suspect the crime. We were shocked. The doctors said they had to inform the police, Markin wrote at that time in his Instagram publication.
It is not known what Markin means when he said the district court ordered that he should not speak at the risk of punishment.
If Markin means a ban on expression, there was no confirmation of the Helsinki District Court.
Usually the investigator -in prescribe a ban on expressionduring prosecution this is determined by the prosecutor. The Investigator of the case told Iltalehti that he had not imposed an expression to Markin.