And yet quite a few always scream for investors, also in this forum. There are enough bad examples from England, but in Germany too, the “investor associations” are poorly eliminated in the majority. Kühne and children felt like they jumped in front of every camera, have accepted every interview request and the result was always very manageable in order to put it carefully. The retort clubs make it a bit better in terms of sport and balance, but plastic blue does not get its stadium full and plastic red trickles with combined tickets. Overall, I can hardly think of any positive investor examples.
There are very positive examples of investors.
Brighton -> Tony Bloom
(With the best scouting in
Europe; strong in the Premier League)
Brentford -> Benham; Ancient
(established in the Premier League;
Successful coach Frank was just going
To Tottenham)
Monaco -> Rybolowlew
(Master 2017; permanently in France
Great ; Absolute talent smithy
Mbappe and Bernardo Silva)
Chelsea -> Abramowitsch
(Several championship titles; 2 cl – victories and
The most successful era of the club, up to
he was forced by the state too
go )
RB Leipzig -> Red Bull
(Association in Bundesliga – top
established with outlier last season;
In addition several cup victory)
Leicester City -> Vichai Srivaddhanprabha
(Master 2016; the fans mourn after
still his death around him)
You see, there are also enough positive examples
Investors if you as a club the right and
Selected reliable partner.
The fact that it failed in Germany, for example at Kühne in Hamburg or a child in Hanover, is primarily due to the fact that it is practically impossible in Germany to use 50+1 in Germany
To develop investor and build something sustainable. With 50+1, it is practically not possible to decide what should change with your own invested money in the club, since the power lies with the club. So no serious entrepreneur can work, since such a state is completely unnatural and perverse, because of course the investor decides as a payer what is happening in the club and what decisions are made – after all, he stands for success and failure.
Except in Germany, this has now been understood everywhere, but at the latest when the top clubs in this country threaten to join a super league because the distance to the top of Europe is too great, movement comes into being and 50+1 will fall! This will be the only chance in the long term if you want to avoid a super league and none of the traditionalists who defend themselves against investors can also want it!
But shouldn’t the power lie with the club?
I am not a big fan of the approach: I pay the boom here so I determine. This is always sun king. The idea of clubs is the democratic basis; The participation of all members. Of course there are decision -makers, but it is guaranteed. In addition, it is Humbug that just because someone has money and/or entrepreneur this person has an idea of everything. You can also get money with little entrepreneurial skills. Even if you have skilled, this does not yet require an upscale general knowledge. You just understood and applied the (quite simple) rules of the market. With luck and timing everyone can come up with. But that does not mean that you have an idea of, in this case, football and can lead a club. Your examples are characterized by a small interference in the day -to -day business. There were specialists who had ancestor of the matter and thus led to success. Abramowitsch is the best example. He was a donor and fan, otherwise (as far as I know), it was completely out.
A bold and a child could have supported their clubs like this. I don’t think that the HSV or H96 would not have been happy about a new NLZ, for example – completely paid for them. You can also give without always having to collapse directly.