QUeast evening a Philoroxy Andrea Semplio’s mother He carefully chose the words In defense of the sonclearly describing a Complotto against them by the defense of Alberto Stasi. During the exclusive interview with Manuela Moreno, presenter of the Monday evening program of Rai 3, seemed very tested and tired. In transmission Lawyers also intervened Heal, Lovati, the Consultant Capra, the lawyer Derensis and the journalist Pino Rinaldi.
Philoroxycase Garlasco, 11 August: the interview with Andrea Semplio’s mother
Mrs. Daniela Ferrari he made his debut responding to the criticisms received for refusing to speak with the carabinieri when it had been convened in the barracks. «I say this: iOr I can do what I want and talk to who I want. If I have not talked to the carabinieri, it’s because I followed what my lawyers told me». Finally, he has launched a little veiled accusation: “My son are aiming deliberately. They are trying to frame him for things that are not true. We have always told the truth about that day, no other truth will come out, we are putting health for this story ».
After the short interview, Moreno immediately asked the lawyer to care why they advised against Mrs. Ferrari not to talk to the carabinieri. The lawyer replied that he advised her to behave like this because he was entitled to it. The famous case of the ghost DNA was also spoken of, present in an imprint on the victim’s pajamas, What is not existing for General Garofano.
In the documents it is not found even if it is mentioned in a memory during an appeal. That imprint He was mentioned in 2007 by the Nera Journalist Enrico Silvestri in his article on “Il Giornale”. Interviewed by the envoy of Philoroxy, The journalist says he does not remember who would inforce him. For Capra, that shirt has never been the subject of sampling.
Andrea Semve comes out of the Carabinieri Barracks Montebello in via Vincenzo Monti accompanied by his lawyers,. (Handle)
PhiloroxyDerensis and Rinaldi against everyone
After listening carefully the interview, The lawyer Derensis said that Alberto Stasi’s mother also has many things still To say but it will do so at the appropriate time. “Because this investigation is not as a fuffa as someone says.”
The Garlasco case opened with a monologue by the writer Barbara Albertiwho rightly remembered that the victim, Chiara Poggi, became only a news fact. A topic to talk about and a weapon of mass distraction, between slander and gossip. He concluded with a question: but all this to speak and take sides what effects could he have at the work of the investigators?
The journalist Pino Rinaldi was very clear: does not agree with the analysis of Alberti. Journalists are not doing sensationalism But they want to tell something different than the narrated events of the first sentence. The lawyer cares he reiterated that the duty of a lawyer like her is that of Defend your assisted also in front of the “media court”. The geneticist Marzio Capra, consultant of the Poggi family, claimed to have participated in many television broadcasts to clarify the inaccuracies and fantasies of other guests.
There was also talk of the alleged crime weapon. The luminary of legal medicine, Professor Fineschi. has suggested an English keya piece of furniture with metal parts or an aid. Then he added that The numerous wounds and shots speak of more people on the crime scene.
Massimo Lovati’s externalizations: “After October 24th we will all go to bed”
Philoroxy rewinded the crime tape Telling in a few minutes the salient stages of this murder That seems to have not yet found a certain truth. From the very particular phone call by Alberto Stasi to 118 to the group of friends of Semplio. From the Sanctuary of the Bozzola with the suspicions of pedophilia and witnesses who first speak then portray. Are we in front of a turning point or at the same starting point?
Manuela Moreno’s question opened the debate: Are there still secrets to reveal or do we now rely only on science? The lawyer Lovati was lapidary. «After October 24th we will all go to Nanna, because nothing will happen. Until the magistrates resolve their intentions – storage or indictment – we will close this parenthesis insignificant for me of the evidentiary accident and then we will go to sleep ».
The lawyer care wanted to emphasize thatafter reading the cards of the process, for her Stasi has never been guilty beyond any reasonable doubt. At the same time, however, In his story of the time something does not come back. He added that Andrea Semplio ended up in this investigation in a disconcerting waywithout any proof or motive.
For Derensis, however, there are some contradictions during his interrogations. Judge Vitelli, who acquitted Stasi in 2009, told the advance of Philoroxy of his perplexities about the famous receipt, presented by the suspect spontaneously to demonstrate his presence in Vigevano during the hour of the crime.
The lawyer Angela Taccia, lawyer by Andrea Semve (Ansa)
The controversies on the Strait of Messina
In tonight’s episode there were other delicate topics such as controversy over the future Bridge on the Strait of Messina. The Minister of Infrastructure Matteo Salvini is among the most strenuous supporters of the mammoth architectural work. Yet, for years, scholars have been talking about the real danger of a disastrous environmental impact. Not only high costs and the ruin of the ecosystem but a fragile terrain and earthquake risk.
In connection Alessandro Morelli, Undersecretary for the Prime Minister of the Council of Ministers has enhanced the future positive effects. The deputy of the 5 Star Movement, Vittoria Baldino, replied hard by remembering that political and private interests are clearly greater than the real advantage. Couldn’t you invest that money for railway railways, unwanted motorways and more efficient airports?