Johan Derksen does not think that Jeroen Rietbergen, but Angela de Jong has to answer to the judge. She would cross borders with her columns herself. “Combine her!”
Two weeks ago, Angela de Jong wrote a sharp column about the decision not to prosecute Jeroen Rietbergen for rape. She called it a black week for victims of sexual cross -border behavior and fiercely led to lawyers who ‘destroy’ women like Nienke Wijnhoven and Maxime Meiland.
Obsession
The Tiger shark of the AD continues to call Linda de Mol’s love partner ‘dirty Jeroentje’. Why? She is clear about that: “As a 19-year-old candidate by the 47-year-old band leader ‘being aimed’ behind the scenes of a talent show. Whether it is legally rape or not-it is not good. Point.”
And Johan Derksen is pretty pissed off about that. “Yes, Angela de Jong cannot accept that. He has a kind of obsession against people who exceed her standards, but her standards are not decisive in this country,” he brands into his podcast Greetings from Grolloo.
Womanizer
Johan is bothered. “Then I think: yes, Matthijs van Nieuwkerk who has done voice raising … As editor -in -chief I had to do that for years to keep things to the loop. And then Tom Egbers, who had a relationship while he was married. Yes, then he has something to explain to his wife, but not to Angela de Jong.”
“And that Jeroen Rietbergen, that is a Womanizer and yes, he has that name, but he can make cross-border jokes and someone falls for his neck, but he has not raped or assaulted anyone. That is a big difference,” said the VI-Snor, who apparently does not realize that not being prosecuted is very different from anyone.
Completely broken
Jeroen is the big victim here, Johan says. “Look, the boy who is completely destroyed by the media, because the media happily participate in it. If someone from the wokleneration says something, they are big heads in the newspaper, and also the quality newspapers: NRC and Volkskrant, they are at the forefront. But that Jeroen Rietbergen is really acquitted.”
Ahum, what a mistake. Jeroen was not acquitted, he never appeared in court at all. Not being prosecuted is not acquittal, it is a seponation. “Nothing punishable has happened,” says Johan. “And such an Angela de Jong who keeps calling him constantly dirty Jeroentje.”
Dirty Jeroentje
Continue to write dirty Jeroentje is going too far, says Johan. “Well, now it is time that the boy sue her because of defamation, because that is simply uncivilized, and Angela de Jong also has to accept a decision of the judge.”
The fact that Johan now plays crocodile tears about the use of ‘dirty Jeroentje’ is to say the least hypocritical. In January 2022, that nickname was first spread nationally by René van der Gijp, sitting next to Johan Bene, in an episode of today Inside. He told you there that he had known that nickname for twenty years.
“That’s private”
Johan believes that Linda should also be left alone about her choice to stay with him. “That has to do with love and feelings and that determines Linda de Mol. And also Angela de Jong, who again had her stubborn opinion about it, but she has nothing to do with that.”
He continues: “That is private. And you should not write from a desk in Rotterdam about things that occur in a living room that nobody has anything to do with.”
Unansque
The report rhetoric sounds cool, but Johan soon scraps back. “I don’t think he should do it, because that gives a lot of annoying publicity. And a columnist who can write a lot in the Netherlands, isn’t it?”
Bram Moszkowicz has tipped Jeroen to sue his victim Nienke Wijnhoven. Johan about that: “That will be a possibility, but it would be very unwise, because Linda and Jeroen eventually jumped out well and I think if you do that, you will get the whole public opinion against you.”
All in all: even according to Johan, Angela can continue to write what she wants. And that is a good thing, because moral censorship through a cigar club is the last thing Hilversum needs.