Bram Moszkowicz thinks it is good that Özcan Akyol was confronted with the Matthijs van Nieuwkerk-Rel during his interview in Zomergasten. “She gets angry him, that man,” he says.
Johan Derksen arrived just before the weekend with a spicy column at the address of his former table guest Özcan Akyol. The VI-snor mentions him in De Telegraaf Among other things ‘the former Toress-Turk’ and criticizes his performance in Zomergasten. “He is very happy with himself and does not like anyone else. A salient case of overestimation.”
Underhanded
That Eus was in Zomergasten last night is again proof of ‘that he is grossly overestimated himself’. “In fact, he plays with fire. If the editors have (…) journalism blood, the tenendful betrayal of Eus will indeed become a topic of conversation. He can only manage by humbling the fine rug.”
The VI-star is referring to the Matthijs van Nieuwkerk-Rel. “Eus apparently understood that the VARA had extremely outrageous images of a scolding and tiering Matthijs. (…) As a tragic low point of his underhanded behavior, there was no video with shocking images at all.”
Male
Hostess Griet Op de Beeck expanded Eus with the Matthijs-Rel last night. “She does it very gentle, but he gets angry. She has him in his weak spot. There are different ways to approach something like that and she does it with a detour, but she gets angry,” says Bram Moszkowicz.
He continues in Shownieuws: “Moreover, he says somewhere:” Friends must be able to tell each other the truth. ” Yes, but he really thrown him in with that video, that he says so badly. That is of course very condescending. “
Nicely
Bram criticizes Eus. “He is in a close way and doesn’t really know what to do. (…) It is not my type of man. He has put the knife in the back of Matthijs, hey, we all agree, but he continues to talk about what he has done in a very nauseating way. He does not yet recognize the start of his mistake.”
Colleague Evert Santegoeds: “Eus for three hours. Well, I was watching, but at some point I was happy that I had to go here again, because I didn’t pull that for three hours. He could of course expect those questions, because yes, he played a role in meaning, and a very strange role.”
Movie
Evert still finds Eus’ role in the scandal doubtful. “Matthijs was his discoverer, his friend and they went to step together in Deventer. (…) They were just gabbers and then suddenly the following happens: that Matthijs goes to RTL and just at that moment Eus is starting to make a video in Hilversum somewhere.”
“Well, he saw that,” and if that comes out … “Well, in the end we’ve seen that video and that is just a editorial meeting of De Wereld Draait Door on the day that the terrible attacks at Charlie Hebdo take place. Of course there is a high voltage on such a day. (…) That video does not represent a single nut at all.”
Bark
Mediaciticus Victor Vlam thinks it is creamy television. “When Matthijs van Nieuwkerk is brought up by Griet at Zomergasten, it becomes an extremely uncomfortable conversation. Both verbally (‘block of RTL Boulevard’) as a non-verbal (Bozige Blik) makes it clear that he does not want to talk about it,” he writes X.
Perhaps Eus did not see this coming at all, he says. “The indignation at EUS was in any case very great. (…) They will undoubtedly have doubted the elitist VPRO whether Griet should bring this up. But this action by Eus has permanently changed the image of him and it provides insight into his character.”